random3 wrote:
as Breitbart News reported,
Nope. You are done. Cut off. You no longer get an opinion.
random3 wrote:
as Breitbart News reported,
Nope. You are done. Cut off. You no longer get an opinion.
Obama continuing to run unchecked IS what the democrats want. You are being very one sided. There are 2 parties at play here. Laws don't get passed because the 2 sides don't agree? Cool. That is the way it is supposed to work. Dems don't get their way? Oh well, lets just sign an executive order and get what we want anyway, bypassing the way government is supposed to work.Obama said he was going to be a unifier and a leader. He claimed he could get two sides to work together. Yet, have we had a more polarizing president? And this has nothing to do with race. It is about Obama's ideals.
Yes Man wrote:
get used to it. wrote:So this is the republican's fault? should they just give the democrats everything they want? It is the democrats faults too.
Well, Yes, actually. This IS the Republican's fault.
Pretty sure that there is a difference between "just giving the democrats everything they want" and choosing to NOT waste time and taxpayer money on this ridiculous lawsuit.
random3 wrote:
Bush's vacations were trips back to his Texas ranch or family vacation homes in Maine.
Obama, on the other hand, has traveled to Hawaii every winter.
So it's ok for Bush to vacation in his home state, but not Obama?
random3 wrote:
... as Breitbart News reported ...
Oh...nevermind.
get used to it. wrote:
Obama said he was going to be a unifier and a leader. He claimed he could get two sides to work together. Yet, have we had a more polarizing president? And this has nothing to do with race. It is about Obama's ideals.
He just couldn't get the two sides together because the Republicans refused to work with him on anything.
The healthcare law was based on a Republican design, the Democrats wanted a public option in there.
This dumb suit is because he empathized with Republican concerns.
He permanently extended the majority of the Bush tax cuts.
He offered finds for the border situation.
He faced unprecedented filibusters and debt ceiling battles that no president before had to face.
You had a Republican shutdown of the government.
A fiscal cliff issue that lead to an enacted sequester by congress.
nope. you are cut off. wrote:
random3 wrote:as Breitbart News reported,
Nope. You are done. Cut off. You no longer get an opinion.
Don't wanna hear, don't wanna see, just tell me some nice stories!
http://book-science.ru/artimage/p2255.jpgThe Republicans had this next presidential election wrapped up until this.
The country is not happy with the Democrats and Obama but this suit is just the sort of thing to give the Democrats something to rally around.
Hillary says thanks.
get used to it. wrote:
Obama continuing to run unchecked IS what the democrats want. You are being very one sided. There are 2 parties at play here. Laws don't get passed because the 2 sides don't agree? Cool. That is the way it is supposed to work. Dems don't get their way? Oh well, lets just sign an executive order and get what we want anyway, bypassing the way government is supposed to work.
Obama said he was going to be a unifier and a leader. He claimed he could get two sides to work together. Yet, have we had a more polarizing president? And this has nothing to do with race. It is about Obama's ideals.
If you're going to talk about being one sided, then you should check your own sentiment towards democrats.
The reason laws don't get passed has nothing to do with the two parties disagreeing on an issue, and almost everything to do with appeasing base numbers to retain their seat in the house or senate. This becomes increasingly more so in a divided republican party that has an internal struggle with the Tea Party, or voting money givers, and the general republican way of thinking.
That's not to say that democrats don't do the same thing, but when you look at what happened to guys like Eric Cantor for not being conservative enough, which is laughable, you can bet that the political stands conservatives are making become more egregious than their counterparts.
Yet somehow still, people blame Obama and put little to no thought into how f'ing terrible this congress is. And guess who you'll vote for, probably the same people.
So, if you really want to blame someone, blame ourselves.
way to do the country's business. oh ... wait.
the Number of exec orders is irrelevant, its the type that is key.
FDR interned Japanese Americans with one order, and if that had been the only order he issued its horrendous.
Obama changes laws with exec orders. Suing him is the channels that the constitution sets up. They arent storming the oval office with guns, making a coup de ta.
L L wrote:
He is being sued for delaying the employer mandate to provide healthcare coverage.
The Republicans are suing him for delaying a provision that they objected to in the first place.
Plus the SCOTUS has already ruled that the President has considerable leeway in how he/she enforces the laws. Delay is perfectly acceptable, as long as it's not systematic or protracted enough that it counts as a de facto repeal of the law.
It's really unclear that the President has gone beyond his Constitutional powers.
Just saying...... wrote:
The Republicans had this next presidential election wrapped up until this.
The country is not happy with the Democrats and Obama but this suit is just the sort of thing to give the Democrats something to rally around.
Hillary says thanks.
what planet are you on. Republicans have a lower approval rating then dems
How can you not get this? You think him not getting his way is the Republican's not working with him. All you mean to say is that they don't vote the way the democrats want them to.
L L wrote:
get used to it. wrote:Obama said he was going to be a unifier and a leader. He claimed he could get two sides to work together. Yet, have we had a more polarizing president? And this has nothing to do with race. It is about Obama's ideals.
He just couldn't get the two sides together because the Republicans refused to work with him on anything.
The healthcare law was based on a Republican design, the Democrats wanted a public option in there.
This dumb suit is because he empathized with Republican concerns.
He permanently extended the majority of the Bush tax cuts.
He offered finds for the border situation.
He faced unprecedented filibusters and debt ceiling battles that no president before had to face.
You had a Republican shutdown of the government.
A fiscal cliff issue that lead to an enacted sequester by congress.
Both parties SUCKS and are one in the same. They are doing NOTHING to stop an INVASION of illegals. They are committing open TREASON.
He extended the tax cuts because he was afraid of the political fall out if he didn't. Wow...he offered finds for the border problem? How presidential. He face uprecdented filibusters and debt ceiling battles? Of course he did...because he ran up our debt into unforeseeable numbers. Otherwise there would not have been a necessity.The republican shutdown was over the budget...which Obama cares nothing about. All republicans are doing/can do is minimize damage done by this moron and his cronies.
L L wrote:
get used to it. wrote:Obama said he was going to be a unifier and a leader. He claimed he could get two sides to work together. Yet, have we had a more polarizing president? And this has nothing to do with race. It is about Obama's ideals.
He just couldn't get the two sides together because the Republicans refused to work with him on anything.
The healthcare law was based on a Republican design, the Democrats wanted a public option in there.
This dumb suit is because he empathized with Republican concerns.
He permanently extended the majority of the Bush tax cuts.
He offered finds for the border situation.
He faced unprecedented filibusters and debt ceiling battles that no president before had to face.
You had a Republican shutdown of the government.
A fiscal cliff issue that lead to an enacted sequester by congress.
i am more of a libertarian. I am a social liberal and a fiscal conservative so I have no favoring of either party. I just get sick of people parroting the media and Obama by blaming the republicans in Congress because they won't pass the laws the democrats and Obama want. I could give a rats ass if any laws are passed if the 2 sides can't agree, chances are it isn't best for our country.
giddy wrote:
get used to it. wrote:Obama continuing to run unchecked IS what the democrats want. You are being very one sided. There are 2 parties at play here. Laws don't get passed because the 2 sides don't agree? Cool. That is the way it is supposed to work. Dems don't get their way? Oh well, lets just sign an executive order and get what we want anyway, bypassing the way government is supposed to work.
Obama said he was going to be a unifier and a leader. He claimed he could get two sides to work together. Yet, have we had a more polarizing president? And this has nothing to do with race. It is about Obama's ideals.
If you're going to talk about being one sided, then you should check your own sentiment towards democrats.
The reason laws don't get passed has nothing to do with the two parties disagreeing on an issue, and almost everything to do with appeasing base numbers to retain their seat in the house or senate. This becomes increasingly more so in a divided republican party that has an internal struggle with the Tea Party, or voting money givers, and the general republican way of thinking.
That's not to say that democrats don't do the same thing, but when you look at what happened to guys like Eric Cantor for not being conservative enough, which is laughable, you can bet that the political stands conservatives are making become more egregious than their counterparts.
Yet somehow still, people blame Obama and put little to no thought into how f'ing terrible this congress is. And guess who you'll vote for, probably the same people.
So, if you really want to blame someone, blame ourselves.
These Confederate relics are still thinking this is 1914
and white male supremacy still rules.Soon it will dawn
on them that the sun has set on them and thankfully we have seen the last conservative white male in the white house.
No chance thats a true statement. When Ebola hits home who's going to get blamed? I guarantee it's not conservative white males. The conservative white males who believe in closing and monitoring our borders will be seen as prophets. Just like Romney's prophetic foreign policy against a hostile Russia was once laughed at. Conservativism is never popular until the sh1t hits the fan.
lpd wrote:
These Confederate relics are still thinking this is 1914
and white male supremacy still rules.Soon it will dawn
on them that the sun has set on them and thankfully we have seen the last conservative white male in the white house.
Obama has no clue what is going on. Look what I found on good old Huffington Post:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/22/obama-romney-russia_n_2003927.html
That Romney sure was an idiot.
1980's called! They want their foreign policy back! LOL!
Oh good, let's pay Congress to do what they do best...waste time and money.
+ 1
