You realize that while the US has been having extreme cold, Australia had to add another color to their heat index because it was so hot. You're not thinking about global averages in which the world is actually heating up, even if the US is breaking records for cold, the rest of the world is breaking records for heat.
Gym Class Shuffle wrote:
You realize that while the US has been having extreme cold, Australia had to add another color to their heat index because it was so hot. You're not thinking about global averages in which the world is actually heating up, even if the US is breaking records for cold, the rest of the world is breaking records for heat.
And the Earth's temperature has not risen since 1998 despite 7% increase in CO2 emissions. Global Warming is a crock.
Surface air temperatures are not the only indicator of climate change (unless you are a dope)
TruthBringer wrote:
Surface air temperatures are not the only indicator of climate change (unless you are a dope)
And the Antartic Ice Cap has increased 1.2 to 1.8% each decade since 1979. It is now the greatest ever measured. That is another measure of climate change.
Har wrote:
dumb wrote:Because you reveal your ignorance by the incorrect premise of the question, which is that the earth is getting colder.
Bingo! In the northeast, this doesn't even rank among the top 50 coldest winters.
Top 50 out of the 4.6 billion winters we've recorded. We could still be in the top .00000001% of coldest winters in earth's history!!!!!!!!!!
\"A peer group of independent, private sector scientists has organized the Non-governmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC). Earlier in September, the NIPCC issued its own comprehensive, voluminous report on the science of climate change, Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science, published by the Heartland Institute.\"
This tells you all you need to know about the credibility of this so-called report. Just because you can cut and paste from Forbes doesn\'t mean you know anything about how to read or interpret all those words.
The reason people refer to you scramble-heads as \"one of those people\" is because they\'re too nice to call you what you really are: big industry\'s bitches.
Is this important to you wrote:
- science does not "say" that the globe is unquestionably getting warmer.
So there's no proof?
Is this important to you wrote:
- it isn't happening because of the evils of mankind driving cars and burning fossil fuels.
But it is happening.
I did some research.
Most of the skeptical predict a 1% rise in temperatures by the end of then century.
The planet is still emerging from an ice age.
TKTKTK wrote:
"A peer group of independent, private sector scientists has organized the Non-governmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC). Earlier in September, the NIPCC issued its own comprehensive, voluminous report on the science of climate change, Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science, published by the Heartland Institute."
This tells you all you need to know about the credibility of this so-called report. Just because you can cut and paste from Forbes doesn't mean you know anything about how to read or interpret all those words.
The reason people refer to you scramble-heads as "one of those people" is because they're too nice to call you what you really are: big industry's bitches.
You do know that most intelligent people are laughing at those still clinging to Global Warming? And when Obama or Gore says the "science is settled" that that is about the stupidest thing a person could say about any science? You Global Warmists are way past looking ridiculous.
The missing word is "scientists", "skeptical scientists".
That's not true.
Sally Vixxxxxens wrote:
Gym Class Shuffle wrote:You realize that while the US has been having extreme cold, Australia had to add another color to their heat index because it was so hot. You're not thinking about global averages in which the world is actually heating up, even if the US is breaking records for cold, the rest of the world is breaking records for heat.
And the Earth's temperature has not risen since 1998 despite 7% increase in CO2 emissions. Global Warming is a crock.
No Way wrote:
That's not true.
Sally Vixxxxxens wrote:And the Earth's temperature has not risen since 1998 despite 7% increase in CO2 emissions. Global Warming is a crock.
It is true. You can't just wish it false. Even the liberal UK organizations are admitting this now.
Sally, we have this discussion once a week and you've never been able to back up your claim.
Sally Vixxxxxens wrote:
No Way wrote:That's not true.
It is true. You can't just wish it false. Even the liberal UK organizations are admitting this now.
No Way - this is from the 2013 IPCC report:
The globally averaged combined land and ocean surface temperature data as calculated by a linear
trend, show a warming of 0.85 [0.65 to 1.06] °C3, over the period 1880 to 2012, when multiple
independently produced datasets exist. The total increase between the average of the 1850–1900
period and the 2003–2012 period is 0.78 [0.72 to 0.85] °C, based on the single longest dataset
available4 (see Figure SPM.1). {2.4}
For the longest period when calculation of regional trends is sufficiently complete (1901 to 2012),
almost the entire globe has experienced surface warming (see Figure SPM.1). {2.4}
In addition to robust multi-decadal warming, global mean surface temperature exhibits substantial
decadal and interannual variability (see Figure SPM.1). Due to natural variability, trends based on
short records are very sensitive to the beginning and end dates and do not in general reflect
long-term climate trends. As one example, the rate of warming over the past 15 years (1998–2012;
0.05 [–0.05 to 0.15] °C per decade), which begins with a strong El Niño, is smaller than the rate
calculated since 1951 (1951–2012; 0.12 [0.08 to 0.14] °C per decade)5. {2.4}
Thanks for proving my point.
Sally Vixxxxxens wrote:
No Way - this is from the 2013 IPCC report:
The globally averaged combined land and ocean surface temperature data as calculated by a linear
trend, show a warming of 0.85 [0.65 to 1.06] °C3, over the period 1880 to 2012, when multiple
independently produced datasets exist. The total increase between the average of the 1850–1900
period and the 2003–2012 period is 0.78 [0.72 to 0.85] °C, based on the single longest dataset
available4 (see Figure SPM.1). {2.4}
For the longest period when calculation of regional trends is sufficiently complete (1901 to 2012),
almost the entire globe has experienced surface warming (see Figure SPM.1). {2.4}
In addition to robust multi-decadal warming, global mean surface temperature exhibits substantial
decadal and interannual variability (see Figure SPM.1). Due to natural variability, trends based on
short records are very sensitive to the beginning and end dates and do not in general reflect
long-term climate trends. As one example, the rate of warming over the past 15 years (1998–2012;
0.05 [–0.05 to 0.15] °C per decade), which begins with a strong El Niño, is smaller than the rate
calculated since 1951 (1951–2012; 0.12 [0.08 to 0.14] °C per decade)5. {2.4}
no one is clinging to "Global Warming", we are respecting science..
you are simply another in a long time useful idiots who protected the establishment with utter b-crap.
"The earth orbits the sun"
"The earth is flat"
"black people are genetically inferior"
"Smoking doesn't cause lung cancer"
'Global warming is a myth"
Meanwhile reality is a thing..
Here is my pet peeve with AGW believers. They believe that we (the USA) can somehow take steps to reverse global CO2 emissions by a meaningful amount. We (the USA) are no longer the problem when it comes to CO2. Look at this data.
US CO2 emissions in 1995: ~ 5,400MT
US CO2 emissions in 2013: ~ 5,100MT
The USA has reduced annual CO2 emissions by about 5% overall and 20% per capita since 1995.
Meanwhile...
China CO2 levels in 2013: 9,800MT
US CO2 levels in 2013: 5,100MT
China is producing nearly TWICE as much CO2 as us! Worse, Chinese CO2 levels are increasing at about 800MT PER Year!
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.KT/countries
Many people are still under the misconception that if we drive less and reduce our carbon footprints, we can make a difference in global CO2 levels. The driving force is China.
No Way wrote:
Thanks for proving my point.
haha
Sally Vixxxxxens stand and salute because that is what we call Major Ownage.
someone so "intelligent"..they disprove their own points with cut and past job...classic
exthrower wrote:
Because Global Warming has become a religion for the libs.
Wrong..people to who respect science will change their minds when presented with new (real) evidence.
that is pretty much the opposite of religion. Go back home and tell mommy you tried
fisky wrote:
Here is my pet peeve with AGW believers. They believe that we (the USA) can somehow take steps to reverse global CO2 emissions by a meaningful amount. We (the USA) are no longer the problem when it comes to CO2. Look at this data.
US CO2 emissions in 1995: ~ 5,400MT
US CO2 emissions in 2013: ~ 5,100MT
The USA has reduced annual CO2 emissions by about 5% overall and 20% per capita since 1995.
Meanwhile...
China CO2 levels in 2013: 9,800MT
US CO2 levels in 2013: 5,100MT
China is producing nearly TWICE as much CO2 as us! Worse, Chinese CO2 levels are increasing at about 800MT PER Year!
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.KT/countrieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions#List_of_countries_by_2012_emissions_estimatesMany people are still under the misconception that if we drive less and reduce our carbon footprints, we can make a difference in global CO2 levels. The driving force is China.
STOP! That does not fit our liberal agenda!
Man causes everything! Controls must be put in place!
The sun has nothing to do with this. NOTHING!!!!
Global warming is my theology and I prefer to worship at the altar of government control and increased taxation.