kettler wrote:
SMJO wrote:Every poster who uses the moniker Hardloper and its variations is deficient in knowledge.
No different than every person that uses the SMJO moniker
Everything I know however, is correct.
for what it's worth wrote:
Purpose of running "repeats" is to teach the body to become more efficient and relaxed at running a given pace. Repeats should be run when fully recovered, as much as 5 min. between 400's. 75/76 sec per 400 and should feel controlled.
There is more than one reason to run repeats.
You need a shorter refractory interval to impress
not worth much wrote:
for what it's worth wrote:Purpose of running "repeats" is to teach the body to become more efficient and relaxed at running a given pace. Repeats should be run when fully recovered, as much as 5 min. between 400's. 75/76 sec per 400 and should feel controlled.
There is more than one reason to run repeats.
The only purpose of training is to become faster.
SMJO wrote:
kettler wrote:No different than every person that uses the SMJO moniker
Everything I know however, is correct.
Except for all the times that you've been shown to be wrong. Keep living in your delusional world.
You can't name any of those times.
SMJO wrote:
You can't name any of those times.
Yes I can. And thanks for confirming that those times exist.
They exist in the sum of zero. You cannot name them.
v6 wrote:
HardLoper wrote:That is a lot of rest. You could do them near 800 pace with that much rest.
lol..
With 3 mins of rest you could do them slightly below or at 1600m pace probably.
If 10 x 400 at mile pace with 1 minute rest is a common mile workout, and 6 x 400 at 800 pace with 2 minutes rest Jumbo Elliot's complimentary workout, what do you think you could do with 3 minutes of rest?
Galen did at least this many 400s and 800s at 800m and mile race pace on 3 minutes rest after his 5K. AFTER THE 5K.
SMJO wrote:
not worth much wrote:There is more than one reason to run repeats.
The only purpose of training is to become faster.
False. Another purpose would be to increase endurance.
SMJO wrote:
They exist in the sum of zero. You cannot name them.
You were wrong twice on one page, a rare feat even for a LetsRunner.
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=5617558Have you actually tried what you are suggesting?
HardLoper wrote:
If 10 x 400 at mile pace with 1 minute rest is a common mile workout
It's not, you moran.
HardLoper wrote:
SMJO wrote:They exist in the sum of zero. You cannot name them.
You were wrong twice on one page, a rare feat even for a LetsRunner.
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=5617558
Incorrect. Show me where I was wrong. My points were entirely based on facts, not speculation.
Hogtown wrote:
SMJO wrote:The only purpose of training is to become faster.
False. Another purpose would be to increase endurance.
The only reason to increase endurance is to get faster at endurance events.
SMJO wrote:
Have you actually tried what you are suggesting?
HardLoper is a sub 18 5k runner with several months of running experience. Of course he knows how to modify Galen Rupp's workouts so that they fit a 5:05 miler.
HardLoper wrote:
v6 wrote:lol..
With 3 mins of rest you could do them slightly below or at 1600m pace probably.
If 10 x 400 at mile pace with 1 minute rest is a common mile workout, and 6 x 400 at 800 pace with 2 minutes rest Jumbo Elliot's complimentary workout, what do you think you could do with 3 minutes of rest?
Galen did at least this many 400s and 800s at 800m and mile race pace on 3 minutes rest after his 5K. AFTER THE 5K.
I would like to see someone do 6x400 @ 800 pace...
Hogtown wrote:
SMJO wrote:The only purpose of training is to become faster.
False. Another purpose would be to increase endurance.
Do you mean to become faster over a longer distance?
SMJO wrote:
The only reason to increase endurance is to get faster at endurance events.
False. I am pointing it out right here for you. You are wrong. The sum of your wrongs is not zero. I repeat, you are wrong.