Down goes the Dow

---

The Unkle wrote:

---

agip wrote:

---

seattle prattle wrote:

---

The Unkle wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

Stop The Steal wrote:
Igloi, Why aren't you posting about the voter fraud? Fight back. This is more important than the markets.

---

Clearly something was wrong with this election. I am perfectly content to see the cards fall as they may, since I do believe it is a House of Cards on many levels.

---

I have never seen massive leads in several key states on the morning following the election disappear. All of them. Over 700,000 vote lead in PA.

---

Many of us saw this coming.
And the press warned us about it before the election. Trust me. I read it and it was plain and simple.
Trump saw it coming to and he played the public.
The ploy was that Rep. could bet on a strong in person voter turnout on election day, and Trump even explicitly encouraged it. Then, as they start counting mail-in ballots, the lead would diminish, because it is well documented that Dems tend to vote by mail a lot more than do Reps. Again, the papers knew this and said as much, and even predicted this would most likely happen.
And Trump encouraged it probably to make it look more suspect.
It's not rocket surgery. It is a con. It has been examined by numerous courts. And you are being played.
Sorry.

---

+1
every reputable news org told us to expect this to happen because of how Dems and Reps vote.
every reputable news org predicted this.
If you don't read the news that's on you.

---

Exactly.

The MSM told us in advance what to think.

The fact remains, numbers in an election have never shifted so much

---

---

The Unkle wrote:

---

agip wrote:

---

seattle prattle wrote:

---

The Unkle wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

Stop The Steal wrote:
Igloi, Why aren't you posting about the voter fraud? Fight back. This is more important than the markets.

---

Clearly something was wrong with this election. I am perfectly content to see the cards fall as they may, since I do believe it is a House of Cards on many levels.

---

I have never seen massive leads in several key states on the morning following the election disappear. All of them. Over 700,000 vote lead in PA.

---

Many of us saw this coming.
And the press warned us about it before the election. Trust me. I read it and it was plain and simple.
Trump saw it coming to and he played the public.
The ploy was that Rep. could bet on a strong in person voter turnout on election day, and Trump even explicitly encouraged it. Then, as they start counting mail-in ballots, the lead would diminish, because it is well documented that Dems tend to vote by mail a lot more than do Reps. Again, the papers knew this and said as much, and even predicted this would most likely happen.
And Trump encouraged it probably to make it look more suspect.
It's not rocket surgery. It is a con. It has been examined by numerous courts. And you are being played.
Sorry.

---

+1
every reputable news org told us to expect this to happen because of how Dems and Reps vote.
every reputable news org predicted this.
If you don't read the news that's on you.

---

Exactly.

The MSM told us in advance what to think.

The fact remains, numbers in an election have never shifted so much

---

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Clearly something was wrong with this election.

---

---

Racket wrote:

---

The Unkle wrote:

---

agip wrote:

---

seattle prattle wrote:

---

The Unkle wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

Stop The Steal wrote:
Igloi, Why aren't you posting about the voter fraud? Fight back. This is more important than the markets.

---

Clearly something was wrong with this election. I am perfectly content to see the cards fall as they may, since I do believe it is a House of Cards on many levels.

---

I have never seen massive leads in several key states on the morning following the election disappear. All of them. Over 700,000 vote lead in PA.

---

Many of us saw this coming.
And the press warned us about it before the election. Trust me. I read it and it was plain and simple.
Trump saw it coming to and he played the public.
The ploy was that Rep. could bet on a strong in person voter turnout on election day, and Trump even explicitly encouraged it. Then, as they start counting mail-in ballots, the lead would diminish, because it is well documented that Dems tend to vote by mail a lot more than do Reps. Again, the papers knew this and said as much, and even predicted this would most likely happen.
And Trump encouraged it probably to make it look more suspect.
It's not rocket surgery. It is a con. It has been examined by numerous courts. And you are being played.
Sorry.

---

+1
every reputable news org told us to expect this to happen because of how Dems and Reps vote.
every reputable news org predicted this.
If you don't read the news that's on you.

---

Exactly.

The MSM told us in advance what to think.

The fact remains, numbers in an election have never shifted so much

---

"How did a 700,000 vote lead get erased!?!"

Well you see, there's this thing called "counting" and it's not really about a finish line in a race. I know this is difficult for the severely mentally challenged such as yourself, so perhaps an IQ appropriate lesson can help you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AoxCkySv34

---

Anybody who thinks the election was a fraud, without evidence to back it up, is a goofball.

---

agip wrote:

---

The Unkle wrote:

---

agip wrote:

---

seattle prattle wrote:

---

The Unkle wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

Stop The Steal wrote:
Igloi, Why aren't you posting about the voter fraud? Fight back. This is more important than the markets.

---

Clearly something was wrong with this election. I am perfectly content to see the cards fall as they may, since I do believe it is a House of Cards on many levels.

---

I have never seen massive leads in several key states on the morning following the election disappear. All of them. Over 700,000 vote lead in PA.

---

Many of us saw this coming.
And the press warned us about it before the election. Trust me. I read it and it was plain and simple.
Trump saw it coming to and he played the public.
The ploy was that Rep. could bet on a strong in person voter turnout on election day, and Trump even explicitly encouraged it. Then, as they start counting mail-in ballots, the lead would diminish, because it is well documented that Dems tend to vote by mail a lot more than do Reps. Again, the papers knew this and said as much, and even predicted this would most likely happen.
And Trump encouraged it probably to make it look more suspect.
It's not rocket surgery. It is a con. It has been examined by numerous courts. And you are being played.
Sorry.

---

+1
every reputable news org told us to expect this to happen because of how Dems and Reps vote.
every reputable news org predicted this.
If you don't read the news that's on you.

---

Exactly.

The MSM told us in advance what to think.

The fact remains, numbers in an election have never shifted so much

---

right, because all the experts told us, mail-in voting has never been used so much.
Ds flocked to mail-in voting
Rs were told not to use it.
and R states purposefully chose not to count the mail ballots early, so idiots would see the change in the vote after election day and cry foul. A very very cynical move that you apparently fell for.

---

---

Swaglord_the_real_one_1_1 wrote:
Anybody who thinks the election was a fraud, without evidence to back it up, is a goofball.

---

---

the media is corrupt wrote:

Yeah, don’t let the fact that poll workers were prevented from observing from a distance where they could actually see what was going on make you distrust the Fake News media narrative. Or that poll workers were told to leave as counting done for the night, and then suitcases of ballots dragged out.

Got to hand it to the Chinese ... they are ruthless but effective. They were able to get Dementia Joe elected.

---

---

seattle prattle wrote:

---

Swaglord_the_real_one_1_1 wrote:
Anybody who thinks the election was a fraud, without evidence to back it up, is a goofball.

---

Exactly.
Interesting discussion yesterday on the Trump thread. A link to some guys blog was posted in which he said the point for Trumpsters is this - they just hate libs. They will toe the party line about fraud not becuase it is true or they actually believe it to be true, but just because they hate the notion that Dems and liberals would win much more than living with a lie.
That's the bottom line.
If you haven't read it, it's a good read and explains a lot.

---

---

CISA wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Clearly something was wrong with this election.

---

And what would that be? Officials and poll workers from both sides of the aisle and all over the country have called this the most secure U.S. election ever. Even some of Trump’s own appointees are saying the same. What do you know that they don’t?

---

---

The Unkle wrote:

---

agip wrote:

---

The Unkle wrote:

---

agip wrote:

---

seattle prattle wrote:

---

The Unkle wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

Stop The Steal wrote:
Igloi, Why aren't you posting about the voter fraud? Fight back. This is more important than the markets.

---

Clearly something was wrong with this election. I am perfectly content to see the cards fall as they may, since I do believe it is a House of Cards on many levels.

---

I have never seen massive leads in several key states on the morning following the election disappear. All of them. Over 700,000 vote lead in PA.

---

Many of us saw this coming.
And the press warned us about it before the election. Trust me. I read it and it was plain and simple.
Trump saw it coming to and he played the public.
The ploy was that Rep. could bet on a strong in person voter turnout on election day, and Trump even explicitly encouraged it. Then, as they start counting mail-in ballots, the lead would diminish, because it is well documented that Dems tend to vote by mail a lot more than do Reps. Again, the papers knew this and said as much, and even predicted this would most likely happen.
And Trump encouraged it probably to make it look more suspect.
It's not rocket surgery. It is a con. It has been examined by numerous courts. And you are being played.
Sorry.

---

+1
every reputable news org told us to expect this to happen because of how Dems and Reps vote.
every reputable news org predicted this.
If you don't read the news that's on you.

---

Exactly.

The MSM told us in advance what to think.

The fact remains, numbers in an election have never shifted so much

---

right, because all the experts told us, mail-in voting has never been used so much.
Ds flocked to mail-in voting
Rs were told not to use it.
and R states purposefully chose not to count the mail ballots early, so idiots would see the change in the vote after election day and cry foul. A very very cynical move that you apparently fell for.

---

I know what the official narrative is. I have heard it over and over again in the media.

Not sure why you guys feel I need to hear it again

---

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

CISA wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Clearly something was wrong with this election.

---

And what would that be? Officials and poll workers from both sides of the aisle and all over the country have called this the most secure U.S. election ever. Even some of Trump’s own appointees are saying the same. What do you know that they don’t?

---

Every vote counts! 😹

---

---

CISA wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

CISA wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Clearly something was wrong with this election.

---

And what would that be? Officials and poll workers from both sides of the aisle and all over the country have called this the most secure U.S. election ever. Even some of Trump’s own appointees are saying the same. What do you know that they don’t?

---

Every vote counts! 😹

---

I honestly didn’t expect a rational response from you. Your history here suggests you’re not particularly bright which suggests you would be receptive to RWNJ conspiracy theories. Thanks for not letting me down.

---

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

CISA wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

CISA wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Clearly something was wrong with this election.

---

And what would that be? Officials and poll workers from both sides of the aisle and all over the country have called this the most secure U.S. election ever. Even some of Trump’s own appointees are saying the same. What do you know that they don’t?

---

Every vote counts! 😹

---

I honestly didn’t expect a rational response from you. Your history here suggests you’re not particularly bright which suggests you would be receptive to RWNJ conspiracy theories. Thanks for not letting me down.

---

We should all be so lucky to have smart, superior people like yourself making decisions for us lowly conservatives. Fortunately we had right thinking people as yourself to uncover Trump ordering prostitutes to piss on a Moscow hotel bed once slept in by President Obama, and uncovering Justice Brent Kavanaugh’s proclivities of multiple attempted rapes while over indulging in beer drinking. Meanwhile, several lawsuits move through the courts all related in some way to recent changes to voting rules in key swing states in the months leading up to the 2020 Presidential Election. Sworn affidavits are statements of fact the same as testimony in a court of law. Hundreds have been attested to following the election. So hardly a RWNJ conspiracy theory, the merits of which are determined by our system of law. Like many posters on your side you conveniently avoid equal protection and application under the law.

You should school yourself a little more on the subject before you let your biases rule your intellect, or lack thereof.

I wish the best for a future Biden Administration,

---

---

CISA wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

CISA wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

CISA wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Clearly something was wrong with this election.

---

And what would that be? Officials and poll workers from both sides of the aisle and all over the country have called this the most secure U.S. election ever. Even some of Trump’s own appointees are saying the same. What do you know that they don’t?

---

Every vote counts! 😹

---

I honestly didn’t expect a rational response from you. Your history here suggests you’re not particularly bright which suggests you would be receptive to RWNJ conspiracy theories. Thanks for not letting me down.

---

We should all be so lucky to have smart, superior people like yourself making decisions for us lowly conservatives. Fortunately we had right thinking people as yourself to uncover Trump ordering prostitutes to piss on a Moscow hotel bed once slept in by President Obama, and uncovering Justice Brent Kavanaugh’s proclivities of multiple attempted rapes while over indulging in beer drinking. Meanwhile, several lawsuits move through the courts all related in some way to recent changes to voting rules in key swing states in the months leading up to the 2020 Presidential Election. Sworn affidavits are statements of fact the same as testimony in a court of law. Hundreds have been attested to following the election. So hardly a RWNJ conspiracy theory, the merits of which are determined by our system of law. Like many posters on your side you conveniently avoid equal protection and application under the law.

You should school yourself a little more on the subject before you let your biases rule your intellect, or lack thereof.

I wish the best for a future Biden Administration,

---

Have you actually read any of those affidavits? My guess is you haven’t and that you’re just toeing the line that you are told to. Let me educate you. Most of those affidavits have been deemed by Trump’s lawyers to be useless and have not been included in any legal proceedings. Of the handful that have seen the inside of a court, many have been dismissed by judges as inadmissible or not credible. Those include the one where data from Minnesota was ‘mistaken’ to be from Michigan and the one where someone claimed they heard someone else say something (hearsay). And some of what Trump described as “shocking allegations” were affidavits that did not allege any wrongdoing with ballots. Instead, they showed poll challengers complaining about other things: a loud public-address system, mean looks from poll workers, and a Democratic poll watcher who said “Go back to the suburbs, Karen.”

So it would seem I have been better schooled than you on this topic. Now you know too. You’re welcome.

---

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

CISA wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

CISA wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

---

CISA wrote:

---

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Clearly something was wrong with this election.

---

And what would that be? Officials and poll workers from both sides of the aisle and all over the country have called this the most secure U.S. election ever. Even some of Trump’s own appointees are saying the same. What do you know that they don’t?

---

Every vote counts! 😹

---

I honestly didn’t expect a rational response from you. Your history here suggests you’re not particularly bright which suggests you would be receptive to RWNJ conspiracy theories. Thanks for not letting me down.

---

We should all be so lucky to have smart, superior people like yourself making decisions for us lowly conservatives. Fortunately we had right thinking people as yourself to uncover Trump ordering prostitutes to piss on a Moscow hotel bed once slept in by President Obama, and uncovering Justice Brent Kavanaugh’s proclivities of multiple attempted rapes while over indulging in beer drinking. Meanwhile, several lawsuits move through the courts all related in some way to recent changes to voting rules in key swing states in the months leading up to the 2020 Presidential Election. Sworn affidavits are statements of fact the same as testimony in a court of law. Hundreds have been attested to following the election. So hardly a RWNJ conspiracy theory, the merits of which are determined by our system of law. Like many posters on your side you conveniently avoid equal protection and application under the law.

You should school yourself a little more on the subject before you let your biases rule your intellect, or lack thereof.

I wish the best for a future Biden Administration,

---

Have you actually read any of those affidavits? My guess is you haven’t and that you’re just toeing the line that you are told to. Let me educate you. Most of those affidavits have been deemed by Trump’s lawyers to be useless and have not been included in any legal proceedings. Of the handful that have seen the inside of a court, many have been dismissed by judges as inadmissible or not credible. Those include the one where data from Minnesota was ‘mistaken’ to be from Michigan and the one where someone claimed they heard someone else say something (hearsay). And some of what Trump described as “shocking allegations” were affidavits that did not allege any wrongdoing with ballots. Instead, they showed poll challengers complaining about other things: a loud public-address system, mean looks from poll workers, and a Democratic poll watcher who said “Go back to the suburbs, Karen.”

So it would seem I have been better schooled than you on this topic. Now you know too. You’re welcome.

---

In regards to the depositions and affidavits, it is not up to your reading to deem credibility, so you just wasted plenty of time. Move on to the Trump Thread where you can rehash the same topics with your peers for the next four years. Or, perhaps if there is a Special Counsel appointed to investigate Biden Family overseas business influence peddling, it will re-emerge as the Biden Thread. I am sure you can come up with plenty of LWNJ conspiracy theories.😘

---

Please don't take this thread into the gutter with politics. We already have a thread for that.

---

Sally Vix wrote:
Please don't take this thread into the gutter with politics. We already have a thread for that.

---