That is the difference. You think the market returns since 11/4/2016 are durable.
That is the difference. You think the market returns since 11/4/2016 are durable.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
That is the difference. You think the market returns since 11/4/2016 are durable.
Why do you constantly try to put words into other’s mouths?
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
That is the difference. You think the market returns since 11/4/2016 are durable.
Sp what have we learned?
1. People are always twisting your words.
2. You know what people are thinking better than they do.
He can’t win an argument based on facts, so he makes up his own. He’s been doing that here since day 1.
Actually 130 years of market history support my contention that the market is grossly overvalued.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Actually 130 years of market history support my contention that the market is grossly overvalued.
I said it before and I will say it again:
If somebody is making investment decision for you today (or has been for the past 3 1/2 years) based on market history, you should drop him or her like a hot potato.
"It's Different this Time"
Now, tell me what I'm really thinking.
I could care less what you are thinking or not thinking, but I think you are delusional.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Actually 130 years of market history support my contention that the market is grossly overvalued.
Of course it is. But it has been for quite awhile, yet we are still in a bull market. Thus, overvaluation is not enough for a market downturn.
I guess one weighs the probabilities of what is more likely to occur. If you are young with little at risk it doesn’t matter much.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Actually 130 years of market history support my contention that the market is grossly overvalued.
And how does that give you the right to speak for someone else?
A: It doesn’t.
Questionaire wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
That is the difference. You think the market returns since 11/4/2016 are durable.
Why do you constantly try to put words into other’s mouths?
You don't think the market returns since 11/4/2016 are durable?
Financial Advisor wrote:
[quote]Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Of course it is. But it has been for quite awhile, yet we are still in a bull market. Thus, overvaluation is not enough for a market downturn.
You need some work on comma placement.
mellon wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Actually 130 years of market history support my contention that the market is grossly overvalued.
I said it before and I will say it again:
If somebody is making investment decision for you today (or has been for the past 3 1/2 years) based on market history, you should drop him or her like a hot potato.
"It's Different this Time"
Now, tell me what I'm really thinking.
To describe what you do as thinking is overly generous.
?
Need sum wrote:
Financial Advisor wrote:
[quote]Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Of course it is. But it has been for quite awhile, yet we are still in a bull market. Thus, overvaluation is not enough for a market downturn.
You need some work on comma placement.
Oh, the irony!
Too generous wrote:
To describe what you do as thinking is overly generous.
Thinking your call for a major decline for the past 3 1/2 years has been wrong.
How has my thinking been so far?
Sorry, please address your rrsponse to one of your other tormentors.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Sorry, please address your rrsponse to one of your other tormentors.
He addressed it to K5 who asked the question. Did you think it was about you?
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Sorry, please address your rrsponse to one of your other tormentors.
I only have one. With multiple handles!
Narcissist detector wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Sorry, please address your rrsponse to one of your other tormentors.
He addressed it to K5 who asked the question. Did you think it was about you?
Ah, his 3 1/2 year time frame is usually applied to me. Perhaps like you, he thinks K-5 and I are one and the same. That is part of your insanity hopefully it’s not contagious.