Plan on a 130 year time horizon and you could be right. But on the other hand you will be dead in half that time. So kiss your sample size goodbye.
idiot investor wrote:
I think most statisticians would say the larger sample size is more meaningful, so I'm going to say the 130 year is likely more accurate.
Go Trump Supporters!
Stanley Morgan wrote:HRR wrote:Exactly. And that's why it's ignorant of you to belittle the investment strategies of others on this thread when you know nothing about their personal situations. It seems as if your sole purpose here is to churn sales for your Wall Street overlords.
The point is always to match you equity exposure to your risk tolerance and time horizon. That is all.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Mediocre runner? Hardly, she almost won the 2008 Olympic 100 meter hurdles.
Racist Igy alert!! wrote:
Nice try, jerk. First Lolo, now Asians. What's next?