Obama advisor says that bombing could be related to "Tax Day"

Exactly. But Axelrod is an idiot. Always has been. The president, wisely, generally reserves comment until the facts are in; well, except in the Travon Martin case.

Sagarin wrote:

Exactly. But Axelrod is an idiot. Always has been. The president, wisely, generally reserves comment until the facts are in; well, except in the Travon Martin case.

And except in the Harvard professor case and the cop - A/K/A the Beer Summit. He said right off that the cop was in the wrong without knowing any facts.

Charlie Freak wrote:

That you can't admit Axelrod's clear insinuation was that the bombing was possibly the work of some domestic, conservative, anti-tax group tells me all I need to know about you. He may well turn out to be right, but spare us the spin. It's impossible to have a discussion with someone who won't acknowledge the plain truth in front of their face.

This.

Sickos wrote:

This is how sick and twisted the liberal mind works. They dont want anyone to jump to any conclusions until all the facts are in, or so they claimed with Benghazi, but they turn around and throw some irresponsible comment like this out.

Liberals are 100% pure evil.

Oh, the irony!

It may or may not be a coincidence... But it was Kim Il Sung's birthday on monday...

Sagarin wrote:

Exactly. But Axelrod is an idiot. Always has been. The president, wisely, generally reserves comment until the facts are in; well, except in the Travon Martin case.

Agreed.

Obama’s response to the Boston attack reflects an approach developed over five years in the Oval Office, shaped by past experience in handling terrorism and the chaos that follows an attack.

Let me translate that, Obama will say, that we will not rest until the culprits are brought to justice, all resources of the federal government ....... Just like Benghazi, several months will pass and all will be forgotten. Sources will be ordered not to speak to congressional investigators and the "most transparent administration" will go on its merry way.

ATTENTION every person who has posted on this thread.

THE BOSTON MARATHON IS NOT ALWAYS ON TAX DAY AND NEITHER IS PATRIOT'S DAY.

This year we have Patriot's Day and Tax Day on the same day and Boston is the specific site of many historical events relating to patriotism and the Revolution.

It is not that far fetched to put these three factors together and think they could be motivating factors to a radical.

Yes, Patriot's Day in 1993 was on April 19, the day of Waco, obviously the date changes every year. McVeigh used the date for his bombing. Also date is related to raid of white supremacist group the Covenant, the Sword and the Arm of the Lord (CSA) in 1985, which McVeigh had been in contact with.

Guys, check it out, suspicious letters to Sen. Wicker, now today Ricin Letter to White House, and evacuation of Hart Senate Building due to suspicious package in atrium. Something is up domestically:

http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=5138097

Charlie Freak wrote:

This is disingenuous and intellectually dishonest at best. Yes, what he said was a fact. It was Tax Day. He could just as easily have said "well, it was a Monday..." and that would have been true as well. This is typical Clinton-speak, like "it depends on what the meaning of 'is' is."

That you can't admit Axelrod's clear insinuation was that the bombing was possibly the work of some domestic, conservative, anti-tax group tells me all I need to know about you. He may well turn out to be right, but spare us the spin. It's impossible to have a discussion with someone who won't acknowledge the plain truth in front of their face.

The insinuation that it was some right-wing isn't disingenuous or intellectually dishonest. It's a perfectly valid line of reasoning. What's disingenuous and intellectually dishonest is your inability to admit that the fact that it is Tax Day, and Patriot's Day, and those are perfectly legitimate reasons to consider right-wing groups. The President and Axlerod would be derelict of duty not to consider that, and the wing nuts such as yourself claiming it could only be Islamists are the ones lying to yourselves and the American people.

Uncle B is back wrote:

Aunt Tia wrote:

Right.

The only conclusion we are allowed to jump to is that Muslims did it.

Your brain is Zion*st Occupied Territory

That's enough from you, Uncle B. Go away.

Ever notice you guys never have a factual response to issues raised that do not conform to your prejudices?

The media is gleefully pushing the Muslims did it angle. In fact, they are saying that even if it was a white guy, he was Al Qaeda inspired. And that homemade bombs point to the Middle East.

Aunt Tia wrote:

The media is gleefully pushing the Muslims did it angle. In fact, they are saying that even if it was a white guy, he was Al Qaeda inspired. And that homemade bombs point to the Middle East.

I don't know what network you're watching, but I haven't seen or heard any of that in the media.

Seems wrote:

Aunt Tia wrote:

The media is gleefully pushing the Muslims did it angle. In fact, they are saying that even if it was a white guy, he was Al Qaeda inspired. And that homemade bombs point to the Middle East.

I don't know what network you're watching, but I haven't seen or heard any of that in the media.

You can start with the 4/17/13 Boston Globe or NY Times.

Aunt Tia wrote:

Seems wrote:

I don't know what network you're watching, but I haven't seen or heard any of that in the media.

You can start with the 4/17/13 Boston Globe or NY Times.

Don't feed this troll. Ignore him.

Why doesn't Aunt Liar provide us with a link to some of these allegedly biased articles?

Aunt Tia's husband and brother wrote:

Why doesn't Aunt Liar provide us with a link to some of these allegedly biased articles?

Telling you these articles appeared in the Boston Globe is not enuff? They were also all over the internet.

You guys are incredible when you learn things you don't want to know.

Sagarin wrote:

Exactly. But Axelrod is an idiot. Always has been. The president, wisely, generally reserves comment until the facts are in; well, except in the Travon Martin case.

And the Cambridge cop case. And the Supreme Court case. on and on. What have you been smoking Sagarin?

He (Obama) HOPES it is.

If it isn't he'll send Jay Carney out there to babble for a bit.

I agree with some other posters: why do Liberals want to destroy the America I knew?

Gonzo wrote:

I agree with some other posters: why do Liberals want to destroy the America I knew?

Do you want your country back?