This is a joke of analysis. Did you notice how the Redskins just won the NFC East last night? With RGIII throwing a total o 18 times, completing 9 for 100 yads. I would venture a guess that half of his completions come off some sort of play fake or option read. Which I 100% give him credit for being able to run the option read with quality intelligence and understanding. But we say the ROY for the Redskins last night in Alfred Morris. Without him, RGIII doesn't do quite the same this year. But the same could be said for Alfred Morris - they both significantly helped each other, specifically in that Read Option offense. Kyle Shanahan deserves a Coordinator of the Year award, and that is it for the Redskins Offense.
Russell Wilson is great - at home, where Seattle has the best home field advantage - and has certainly won some games with their studly defense and Marshawn Lynch. His numbers, as you mentioned, are great - but what has he done away from home except the SF game, which he did look great. Problem is, of his offensive plays, he threw the ball 393 times, completing 252 for 3,118 yards, ran it 94 times for 489 yards. This gives him a total of 487 total plays (passes+runs), which is only about 52.5% of Seattle's plays. In fact, Russell Wilson, if you add completions and runs (plays for yards) Wilson has the lowest yards per play moving the chains of the three (10.4).
Andrew Luck had higher INTs, lower completion %, etc. But when you look at his importance to his team, not just how much they asked him to do, it is pretty unbelievable. The Colts passed almost 59% of their plays, vs. ~42.3% for the Seahawks and 43.1% for the Redskins. Now, the argument that the other two were way more important because they had drawn up run plays, calculating those plays into their "Total Plays" Luck was ~64.5% of the plays, vs. ~52.4% for Wilson and ~56.2% for Griffin. Luck took the Colts from laughing stock to 11-5 in one season.
The numbers favor Wilson or Griffin because their offense had a lot more to work with, so defenses didn't have the opportunity to focus on them - they had the luxury of other focal points, mainly a running game (arguably two of the top RBs in the NFC this year), to allow them to be more efficient. Luck had to carry the team - and in the same strain as Adrian Peterson, without Luck, that team is a disaster (as evidenced by last year's debacle). Whereas both of these other QBs could be gone and somebody else step in and get the job done relatively well (definitely not to their standard).
Any other year and these guys are all shoe-in Rookie of the Year (throw Alfred Morris, Blair Walsh (a kicker, really??), Kuechly, and a couple other defenders that I am blanking on names for and this is a very very talented rookie class. I just see a team relying so much more heavily on Andrew Luck, and he certainly achieved.