1) Comparing runner's 400 times and saying that guy A supposedly is more aerobically fit because his 400 to 800 ratio is smaller than guy B. Then they say guy B, who had a faster 400 time but a larger ratio, could potentially be a better runner or a WR holder if he developed aerobically. But guys, it doesn't work that way. Those ratios are rubbish.
2) Which world records are more impressive. They are all impressive and they are all beatable. Some are more beatable or more "soft" than others. Get over it, lets move on in this discussion.
This thread was very, very good for a very, very long time. But lets not lose it in these 2 boring discussions over and over again. Lets talk about training, lets get Tinman, jtupper, and most importantly, Renato Canova back in this discussion!