Sister M E wrote:
Do you (any poster on this board), the runner/cyclist, drive a motorized vehicle? Is it an oversized vehicle?
Yes. I doubt a Subaru Outback counts as oversized, but hope to have a Toyota Highlander in the near future (really trying to hold out for the hybrid in 2005).
What damn difference does it make? You are starting to sound like a holier than thou Boulderidiot.
Would you support the repeal of the "right turn on red" law?
No. It is not the law that is a problem. Also, count the times you reach an intersection where a cyclist is coming or a runner is coming. It is pretty rare really so there is no sense in slowing traffic to a halt for such a rare occurrence.
Just as one should drive defensively, one should run/ride defensively. I always anticipate that the person will not see me.
Answers to these questions and others may explain why we are not making progress in the traffic wars.
Wow, I did not know it was a war. If we are at war, I want a Hummer (the car would not be bad either).
Drivers will do in their vehicles exactly what they do in their living rooms.
If that means yelling at the TV when bone heads like Ted Kennedy come on, then maybe. I yell at people who cut me off, but they cannot hear me and at best it is cathartic.
The mere presence of a bike lane where a driver could once drive is enough to anger some motorists. In the US, the automobile is KING; there are more of them and BIGGER. And there space is shrinking.
There is something to anger everyone out there.
In Boulder, the rights of runners are fought for. I have heard Boulderites described as "exercise Nazis", but there are radicals on the other side of the spectrum. Also, many Boulder drivers are from out-of-town.