Always a hoot to see just how far some of you jerk-offs will go to appear intellectual or just soooo avant-garde. Raging Bull? 2001? Citizen Kane? Crap films?
Is art subjective? Well, duh. But I'd love to see you really break it down as to why these, of all celebrated works, are the films you think are "stupid" or "pointless" or even simply overrated.
Scorcese and Kubrick may have made a few missteps, but to just make some b.s. blanket statement calling all of their efforts garbage is little more than yet more predictable toddler-drool from the usual gaggle of dipturd, rich-kid runners who want to put their smart-mark on the world with as little effort as possible.
I can just see one of you chumps at a bar around the Dartmouth campus laying all this manure on some chick who just got out of her 3rd "Into to Film" class and after seeing her older, pot-bellied professor try to explain why "Raise the Red Lantern," signified a huge cultural uprising and the whole lecture hurt her C-cups just thinking about it, you come along like her knight in shining Izod to let her know there's a revolution happening, and your the "the right is the new left" leader.
And now, of course, someone will bash me for calling you out, but I hope you know, to someone who actually thinks past the atmosphere inside their ego and spends something other than family money, your dumb-ass insights and profundities are the equivalent of a 47 minute 10k.