Are there any major differences between these two shoes other than price? If I can get either one at the same price, which one should I go for?
I normally run in the Asics 2150 shoes and am quite happy with them. I'm looking for something with a bit more cushioning for longer runs on hard surfaces (concrete/asphalt).
3020 is cheaper and usually fits better... kayano has the asymmetrical laces and more gel. I think if more Kayano users knew the 3020 existed, Kayano sales would plummet. As it is, Asics restricts distribution of the 3020 and few stores can/will carry it. But if you can find it, it's a great shoe.
thanks. I can get the kayanos 16 at the same price as the 3020 but I noticed the kayanos are a tad bit heavier. Would the added gel of the kayanos be of any benefit in longer runs (over 8 miles for me) on hard surfaces?
Some would say it helps, others would say its more of a hindrance. Only you can answer that question for yourself.
What about the 2160? they are like $35 less then Kayanos?
Are they durable enough?
I've found eventhough Kayanos cost more, they last me 6 - 8 months. I do like 90 - 100 mpw.
I am a heavier, high-density runner (sprinter/decathlete with lean muscle mass), FWIW, but anyway....
I have tried the Kayano and 21xx lines, but I vastly prefer the 11xx line to both. So much so, that I bought up about 6 pairs of 1150s for the future at $39-$49 /pair. Best bargain out there.
Is the 11XX line lighter? Whats your MPW?