5er wrote:
'counseling' is the only place on the planet where professionals get away with saying that bad behavior is not the fault of an individual.
This is just dumb on its face - here are some places I am responsible for my actions:
school
work
marriage
parenting
running
personal finances
health
weight
grammar
how I dress
how I speak
Here is a list of places I am not responsible for my actions:
addiction
someone explain this to me.
You miss a few distinctions.
I'll point them out by asking some questions.
At what age is a child able to reliably tell the difference between right and wrong?
Where and when is emotional regulation set in the individual?
Who established "impulse control" levels in a child?
After age 18 everyone is Legally responsible for their actions.
Blame and causation are separate issues.
Blame is basically useless, it never leads to anything good.
Determining causation, can lead to positive things.
Basically your entire post is fallacious.
The predominance of evidence is that addicts are Made not Born.
The therapeutic model is not about "blame," but about causation. Once cause is determined, or at least indicated, then the therapists and the individual can begin to chart a healing path. Education, and learning healthy coping skills, and secure adult life skills.
The genetic causation model is an old model, and since basically we know more about genes and neuroscience in the last 10 years, than in the entire human history before.
Yes there has been research that suggest they have found the genes for this addiction and that addiction, but there is also research that shows genes can be effected, or mutated, by stress in early life. (Trauma as another poster astutely pointed out -- and I'll bet most of you do not know the definition in psychology terms -- of trauma.)