I wonder if you see how ridiculous of a statement that is. You only convince me that she IS on drugs by saying such a thing. Why do you keep hiding it? But that is obvious isn't it.
Oh I know how meticulous the UK and the BBC are. That is quite obvious from all the misguided and misleading news reports they put out.
Being tested and getting accurate results are two different things.
I KNOW why she reports her results through the BBC.
Duh.... you have figured it out.
The only naive people are the ones like you who blindly believe anything that is shoved down their throats by the press.
Because Radcliffe slandered Yegorova in public, in the press, tried to run her out of the sport, took away from her victories, got her banned from competitions, and greatly reduced her earnings.
Are we talking about Paula here? Presuming you mean Olga Yegorova, she has passed ALL tests and is innocent because she has passed ALL tests. The only people who think otherwise are racist bigots, those with not enough intelligence to think for themselves, or both.
Her, her, she, Paula? Olga Yegorova won her races, Paula lost hers, so Radcliffe went to the press to lie, distort, destroy and deny her competition the medals they had earned and would have earned in the future.
If you're winning races and people keep throwing bricks at you, you're not going to keep dedicating yourself to the sport, no matter how good you are. Paula knows that and that's the strategy she has used.
I suppose, but how does freezing a mouse prove Radcliffe is innocent?
I hope it does too.