Wow.
he'd have been home free with 2 or 3 less zeros...
Well at least he looks smart.
At least he swung for the fences.
Another one for Americas Dumbest Criminals.
"In addition to the forgery count, Fuller was charged with unlawfully carrying a weapon and possessing marijuana. Officers reported finding less than two ounces of marijuana and a .25-caliber handgun and magazine in his pockets."
"Suspicious of the check amount, the bank called the owner of the check".
The bank employees aren't exactly Mensa members either.
Hood Rat wrote:
The bank employees aren't exactly Mensa members either.
I've got news. A lot of Mensa members aren't exactly Mensa material, either, if you get my drift.
Similarly, my brother-in-law is a rocket scientist--but he's no rocket scientist...
[/quote]
I've got news. A lot of Mensa members aren't exactly Mensa material, either, if you get my drift.
But surely they must be of above average intelligence to join.
Anyway, my point was, unless they were only following bank procedures, was it really necessary to call to verify that it was a valid check/amount?
Stupid? I'd say it was a demonstration of near-human intelligence to take the check to a bank in the first place.
Unlawfully carrying a weapon ... gee, who'd have guessed?
pit bull?