lay it out for us wrote:
You dodged the questions. Why? Nobody here could "convict" him, nor could anyone here "sentence" him. This is the court of public opinion, not a court of law. On the other hand, you appear to be insisting that he be cleared of suspicion.
lay it out for us wrote:So are you saying that you believe in false positives? WHY??
orbitboy wrote:
There's not enough evidence to convict him. Not for a reasonable adult, anyway. You can't convict a guy on suspicion alone.
Excuse me, but I thought I said you have every right to be suspicious.... Hey, I did!!
But to very very many people who post on this board, suspicion (or guilt by association) = guilt. Even if it's just the court of pblic opinion, you're still rendering judgment without enough evidence. It's all very childish. I hope y'all grow up and eventually have enough life experiences to realize how narrow-minded you're being.
Your accusations are nothing more than catty, sour grapes gossip. You're a bunch of jealous girls.