Someone pulled a gun on me yesterday.

traxor wrote:

neo nazis

Hardly. Neo Nazis and skinheads are random and prejudiced. But I'll call a gun waving maniac any name I please. That's post-judging and far from random. Really think tossing out a term like "lawn mowing scratchback" after some illegal invader commits a robbery, rape or murder warrants any mention in light of those crimes? Who cares if an illegal mezcan or its enablers get "offended" by anything anyway? Once they wave that gun, they wave their so called rights along with any respect they might have had if they'd behaved like a civilized higher primate. Putting life threatening criminals under the prison saves more lives and poses less of a drain than putting them in the prison.

yeah, lets go ahead and assume that all Mexicans/other Hispanics are illegals and also criminals; this includes women and small children. Let's start calling them roaches and finding other names to degrade them; lets even refer to individuals using "it" as opposed to he/she. Then lets start a genocide campaign. bring out the machetes.

Unfortunately there are enough psychos like you in this world who think like this. Have you heard of the Holocaust? Kosovo? Rwanda? Darfur? Are you a fan of murdering/raping innocent people and calling it "ethnic cleansing"? Or, are you just bitter that an undocumented immigrant replaced you at your job in the chicken factory?

Didn't make that assumption. Did guess the one that pulled the gun was likely an illegal. It was a criminal in any case once it pointed the gun. And I'll call a Mexican criminal "it" or "bean bag" if I damn well please, just like I'll dehumanize a redneck criminal by calling it "it" or "web-footed, sister-marrying pig buggerer" if I damn well please. You are the one making assumptions. You see the slurs and automatically assume "racism" or "xenophobia" or "Final Solution" when the slurs are being used only to describe after-the-fact c-r-i-m-i-n-a-l-s. Get it? Let's go over this again. I'll call violent criminals any slurs I please.

Never advocated that. Read, man! Taking out gun toting attackers is not murder of innocents and it isn't ethnic cleansing or a repeat of the Holocaust. It's preserving your own life and probably others. As for the "raping" bit, I never once mentioned raping innocents and you've just lost all credibility with all readers with that typical tactic. Another typical tactic in the absence of facts or logic is to fall back on the word "racism" or any of its variants and thinking that automatically wins a debate. That's a logical fallacy called "appeal to emotion." There is actually no debate at all here. We're talking about facing a threat to your life. You protect your life by outgunning the bastard who's trying to kill you.

Nope. That sugar coating ain't gonna work here. It's "illegal." As in unwilling to obey our laws. As in criminal by definition.