I will never stay in a Hilton Hotel again

Rumor has it that the Hilton's sold out and that it's run by a division of Harrah's now. Check it out.

Rumor has it that the Hilton's sold out and that it's run by a division of Harrah's now. Check it out.

$$$$$$ wrote:

Rumor has it that the Hilton's sold out and that it's run by a division of Harrah's now. Check it out.

Really?

Oh man, she's in trouble now. I bet that company goes under tomorrow and she's out on the streets begging for food.

Way to stick it to her.

Hyatt all the way wrote:

I am totally boycotting any hotels owned by the Hilton Companies.

I have had it with this celebrutard Paris Hilton and refuse to help enable her lifestyle by contributing money to the bottom line of a company in which she is an Heiress.

Today's early release from Jail was the final straw.

For those of you who bitch about Martha Stewart, at least she did her time in the pen.

I am sure Barron Hilton is worried about losing your nights at Hampton Inn.

Personally I prefer Marriott properties anyway.

heyo wrote:

Way to stick it to her.

now that's a softball.

Just my way of sticking it to "the man".

Lol

you convinced me Hyatt all the way. No more Hilton's for me either.

Who the hell can afford either one? Motel 6 for me.

I'm on board, no more Hiltons. We can change the world!

Um.... she's a dirty slut.

Why do people care?

Why do you care? You must be really, realy bored and lonely to tie your dreams and aspirations in with her.

Wasn't Pres Bush taken care of in similiar circumstances when he was younger?

Maybe this is the way we can finally get rid of her....put pressure on the company that bears her name and a loss of revenue will have their handlers try to get her to stop hogging the limelight.

- Philip Passen

I will never stay in Paris Hilton again

Hyatt all the way wrote:

I am totally boycotting any hotels owned by the Hilton Companies.

I have had it with this celebrutard Paris Hilton and refuse to help enable her lifestyle by contributing money to the bottom line of a company in which she is an Heiress.

Today's early release from Jail was the final straw.

For those of you who bitch about Martha Stewart, at least she did her time in the pen.

Fine to do that as a statement, but you won't hurt Paris' financial outlook at all. Even though she is a heiress, she has made a lot of money on her own as a model and then on that Simple Life show. If Hilton Hotels went bankrupt tomorrow, she'd still be a multimillionaire, and she'd still get tons of money from her family at some point. She's rich no matter what.

Frankly, NOBODY is given jail time for the offenses she committed in the first place in her county, and most misdemeanor offenders in LA County jails are let out prematurely, equivalent to serving 10% of their time (which she has done). I'm not in anyway condoning Paris Hilton's actions, nor do I really give a shit about her one way or the other, but only because she's Paris Hilton was she given a harsh sentence to begin with. Everyone seems to miss this angle. LEGALLY speaking, she never would have been locked up initially if she was Sally Q. Public, even though politicians want to spin this into a racial, socioeconomic divide issue.

What do I know? wrote:

Frankly, NOBODY is given jail time for the offenses she committed in the first place in her county, and most misdemeanor offenders in LA County jails are let out prematurely, equivalent to serving 10% of their time (which she has done). I'm not in anyway condoning Paris Hilton's actions, nor do I really give a shit about her one way or the other, but only because she's Paris Hilton was she given a harsh sentence to begin with. Everyone seems to miss this angle. LEGALLY speaking, she never would have been locked up initially if she was Sally Q. Public, even though politicians want to spin this into a racial, socioeconomic divide issue.

Her not appearing in court was the key. Otherwise, I would have been okay with probation and such for the underlying offense. Judges do not like it when you do not show up in court.

What do I know? wrote:

Frankly, NOBODY is given jail time for the offenses she committed in the first place in her county, and most misdemeanor offenders in LA County jails are let out prematurely, equivalent to serving 10% of their time (which she has done). I'm not in anyway condoning Paris Hilton's actions, nor do I really give a shit about her one way or the other, but only because she's Paris Hilton was she given a harsh sentence to begin with. Everyone seems to miss this angle. LEGALLY speaking, she never would have been locked up initially if she was Sally Q. Public, even though politicians want to spin this into a racial, socioeconomic divide issue.

Do you even know what her offenses were? She was caught violating her probation not ONCE but TWICE on a SUSPENDED LICENSE. And don't give me this crap about her county, it was a Superior Court judge. I will agree with the 10% rule but to say that her sentence was too harsh is off the wall

Speeve wrote:

Do you even know what her offenses were? She was caught violating her probation not ONCE but TWICE on a SUSPENDED LICENSE. And don't give me this crap about her county, it was a Superior Court judge. I will agree with the 10% rule but to say that her sentence was too harsh is off the wall

Um, yes, I know the FACTS of the case and I don't personally think it was too harsh, but that's not the point. In the interest of FAIRNESS, even with all of her defiance, she was given a more stringent sentence than others would have received (if you worked in the LA County system, you would know this). You may believe she deserved a moderate jail sentence or more, and that's fine, but everyone is focusing on this case as if though she was given a pass, when, in reality, she was given LESS leeway because of her celebrity. Of course, you'll never see one Al Sharpton even making a soft reference to this point.

Anyhow, what a waste of everyone's time talking about this case ad nauseum. Have a nice day.