Republican debate

Of course you mean raping you, right? Yes that is because anyone who is getting raped would react in the same manner. However, were a gay person to touch you in a completely human way, thereby necessitating you to 'bash his head in', then I'd say you're pretty f***ing stupid or not comfortable with your sexuality. Sorry, I don't know how to put it any other way.

repub wrote:

I'm only "afraid" of a gay guy touching me, and then i will bash his gay head in.

You know, you can become gay from using the same toilet seat as them as well. Better be careful. And remember to only sit in the no-gays section in class. My god, you never really know who's been there before you, do you?

You're a despicable piece of shit, I hope you'll someday realize that. Hard to imagine a gay person being less of a man than you. And that includes lesbians. I'd only bash your homophobic head in if I was wearing surgical gloves.

HAHAHAHAHA.

You guys are so funny!

Oh and by "touching me" care to think of that in a SEXUAL way?

Way to freak out.

HAHAHAHAH!!!

Wailing Fungus-You must be a rope sucker too, right?

haha man. I love how you guys take the bait.

Colbert just had a great "the Word" segment on the hypocrisy of those damn liberals who claim to be so tolerant of everyone else's beliefs - except the intolerant! he's right, i mean shouldn't intolerant conservatives have the right to hate anyone they want? you can't persecute someone for their religious beliefs just because those beliefs tell them to persecute others! HYPOCRITES.

Nope, sorry, don't get your hopes up.

Btw, has a woman ever "touched" you? I mean a woman you're NOT related to.

Anyway, I think your'e proving an important point about republicans over and over again on this thread. So keep it up.

I think you're proving the point that liberals are major pussies...oh yea, and hypocrites.

that's my favorite one: "you guys think everyone should have rights? you f***in pussies. i'll beat your faggy liberal ass cause being scared to death of people who are different makes me a tough guy."

person who thinks homophobes are shitheads = pussies apparently

liberals are hypocrites = said as if people on the other side of the coin (radically conservative) are not

a conservative's best defense (actually an intolerant person's best defense) (conservative in the sense that it is used today, so neo-con, radically religious, apparently drinks his milk for dinner, f***s his girl only for babies, everything in life has a purpose and gayness is purposeless, etc.) = liberals are pussies

any way you look at it, a "liberal's" social views are more socially acceptable as a whole, yet their behavior is probably not all that dissimilar from a radically conservative person's behavior. This has nothing to do with gay marriage (which I think is a church's decision, NOT the government's, anyways) but homophobia, plain and simple.

Until the birth rate falls to an unsustainable rate due to homosexuality in this country, the government has ZERO right to ban gay marriage. Churches are much better at being intolerant, let's leave it to them.

Actually, it's because homophobic christian white trash are the REAL endangered minority. Don't you know that the big bad "homosexual agenda" (whoever is behind that) is out to get them? Oh yeah, it's true. The Castro in San Francisco is nothing but a big al Qaeda cell with 150,000 members.

And that last statement is spoken in the vein of true conservative enlightened thinking, none of the crap being put forth by the likes of Young Buck.

Unfortunately gay marriage IS the government's business, not the churches'.

If marriage was only a religious institution, then I would agree with you, but unfortunately marriage has legal sanction in our laws. Marital status makes a world of difference for taxation, immigration, inheritance, legal guardianship, and any number of very important civil matters.

As it is today, a certain minority is basically cut off from enjoying certain rights and benefits. True, gay people can get married just like anybody else - to a person of the OPPOSITE sex, which puts them in an uncomfortable and for them unnatural situation.

It's similar to the ban on interracial marriage several states used to have. You could argue that no rights were violated because people of all races had the same access to marriage. As long as they married someone of their own race. If the ban on gay marriage is not discriminatory, then neither was the ban on interracial marriage.

The best solution to all this would be to write marriage completely out of our laws. Let religious people get married if they so desire, and let their church or mosque or synagogue or temple or tarot card reader create whatever rules for it they like, but it should buy them no legal advantages or benefits over others.

If you wanted to have certain laws pertaining to community property and rights within the family union, then have a "civil union" which is available to all couples.

The current situation is discriminatory and undignified for a society which likes to call itself "free". And what's worse, it is being upheld by people who are motivated by fear, hatred and bigotry.

So could 3 people get married?

Could minors get to adults?

Serious questions.

Sorry, that should be "Could minors get MARRIED to adults?"

question? wrote:

Sorry, that should be "Could minors get MARRIED to adults?"

what do you consider minors? if you mean under 18, then yes, in some places.

we've all heard the conservative mantra:

if you allow gay marriage what's next? marriage to animals? etc.

so, tell me, since the floodgates have opened in some states, what has Pandora's Box unleashed?

Well said.

question? wrote:

So could 3 people get married?

Could minors get to adults?

Serious questions.

You mean, could 3 people enter the same civil union? Probably not. Not because it's "immoral" but because it's not legally practical.

Can minors enter into binding legal contracts? Can they sign for a mortgage? Can they sign a legal waiver to enter a marathon? Why not? Same reason they can't enter civil unions. It's for their own protection.

Serious answers.

As if conservatives have any right to question "what's next?"

Utah is the reddest state there is, and 60% of its people would practice polygamy if it wasn't illegal. Marriage of minors is more prevalent there than in any other state, including "immoral" liberal California and Massachussets.

As for bestiality, what states do you think are in the lead there? Did redneck farmers who fu\ck their livestock vote for Kerry?

RON PAUL 2008!!!!!!