nyariki - in response to your earlier questions. Yes I am a runner. I work in an office that can get very hot and stuffy (we don't have air conditioning). Today has been the hottest day of the year in the UK and the second ever on record. So, my boss, being in a very generous mood said everyone could go home an hour early. No one was expecting this and so it was a pleasant surprise - not that many people had been doing much work after lunchtime anyway...
Britain is sending one male and female marathon runner to the World Champs. This makes me feel very sad, given our history in the event, so the timing of the race isn't going to affect any British runners because we don't have anyone world class at the moment. I shall still watch the race and am looking forward to it. I suspect the reason to hold the race in the afternoon was to do with TV, but the BBC always show everything live whatever time it's on - and I will always watch athletics whatever time its on. (Last night the BBC showed a 40min documentary "Track Wars" about the distance running rivalry between Ethiopa and Kenya - and very interesting it was too.)
I think we agree that if you have aspirations to be among the best in the world, then you just get on with it. Certainly if I was good enough to go the World Champs I wouldn't hesitate - whatever the weather. However, as an athletics fan I believe it is not in the best interests of ALL those competing to hold the race so late in the day. I think we would see a better race by allowing runners to compete at the optimum time, and that is NOT 2pm. Much earlier, or indeed much later, would surely be much better for all concerned.
Finally it is interesting to note that after he won the 3k at Gateshead last month in a 'modest' time of 7:45.93, Kenya?s Abraham Chebii remarked ?It was very hot out there, it would have been better if the race had been held later.?