Young Buck wrote:
All of you idiots posting that Pit Bulls are bad breeds need to do some reading. It's the owners that f*** them up. The owner should get sued. Educate yourself first. Then post.
Spoken like the retard that you are.
Young Buck wrote:
All of you idiots posting that Pit Bulls are bad breeds need to do some reading. It's the owners that f*** them up. The owner should get sued. Educate yourself first. Then post.
Spoken like the retard that you are.
so true.. wrote:
wayward lassie wrote:pitbulls should be shot on sight.
using pitpulls as a weapon is attempted murder.
the owners of the dogs should be locked up and the matter investigated by authorities.
I agree completely. No reason why someone should have a pitbull. It would be nice for one of these dirt-bag pitbull owners (the ones who think having a vicious dog is a badge of honor) run into someone with a pet lion. Now that would be a sight.
Just doesn't seem fair!!!! wrote:
I noticed a couple of youngsters walking to Pitts on a chain.
Do you live in Pennsylvania at least?
Iron Lungs wrote:
Troll Alert!
Main place you find Pit Bulls - in the hood.
Last place you find distance runners - in the hood.
Most people that own Pit Bulls wouldn't know to retain an attorney for such an incident - only defense lawyers.
Running the dog down with your car would be way, way, too endangering to your kid - too great a chance you'd take him out too, accidentally.
Plus you write like an idiot - "they run for their perspective schools" - what the hell does that mean?
You could never pass the child fathering license test.
TROLL
Duh! It means there schools get small the farther away they are. In the parking lot their a 7A school. By the time you get down the road a mile, there 2A.
so true.. wrote:
I agree completely. No reason why someone should have a pitbull. It would be nice for one of these dirt-bag pitbull owners (the ones who think having a vicious dog is a badge of honor) run into someone with a pet lion. Now that would be a sight.
Every pit bull owner I see is a yuppie. The dogs are some of the nicest around. It's probably in the top ten most common dog I see. That quote is from 9 years ago, which is somewhat before the shift in recognizing that pit bulls are not inherently mean, but the poster agreeing with it today has no excuse.
Bop wrote:
so true.. wrote:I agree completely. No reason why someone should have a pitbull. It would be nice for one of these dirt-bag pitbull owners (the ones who think having a vicious dog is a badge of honor) run into someone with a pet lion. Now that would be a sight.
Every pit bull owner I see is a yuppie. The dogs are some of the nicest around. It's probably in the top ten most common dog I see. That quote is from 9 years ago, which is somewhat before the shift in recognizing that pit bulls are not inherently mean, but the poster agreeing with it today has no excuse.
Yeah, they're just sweeties. Just because your pitbull owning facebook friends post some meme doesn't make it true:
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2015/09/21/former-olympian-saves-8-year-old-boy-from-pit-bull-attack/Keep your cool you are in the right here. Any fool should be able to see that!!!
Why is their long run only 4 to 6 miles?
I dont think you should have to pay. I also think given that your youngest is 14 years old, you don't have to be following them in a car or hitting dogs with it to "save there life". Here's a tip, your kids hate that you act like that. Whether they tell you or not its true. No one wants an overprotective dad following them around like that. I always pitied kids with parents like you
These are all really life pit bulls I have seen with my eyes.
Fireball
Young Buck wrote:
All of you idiots posting that Pit Bulls are bad breeds need to do some reading. It's the owners that f*** them up. The owner should get sued. Educate yourself first. Then post.
The problem is the breed. If a Pug has a crappy owner and it goes psycho people don't die. Similar to a full auto rifle. The gun doesn't kill people, the owner does and it just so happens that a full auto rifle does a ton more damage. That's why they're banned.
Just doesn't seem fair!!!! wrote:
I always follow my sons on their runs in my car with my hazards on because I don't trust the drivers coming up behind them.
Lol
cant be unseen wrote:
I dont think you should have to pay. I also think given that your youngest is 14 years old, you don't have to be following them in a car or hitting dogs with it to "save there life". Here's a tip, your kids hate that you act like that. Whether they tell you or not its true. No one wants an overprotective dad following them around like that. I always pitied kids with parents like you
Just give the kids guns, and they can protect themselves from the dogs.
AK47.2 wrote:
The problem is the breed. If a Pug has a crappy owner and it goes psycho people don't die. Similar to a full auto rifle. The gun doesn't kill people, the owner does and it just so happens that a full auto rifle does a ton more damage. That's why they're banned.
Somewhat rational logic here. I own two pitbulls. There both great dogs and I trust them 100% around other people. However, if they ever perceived someone hurting a family member, there would be carnage.
Hmmm..... wrote:
Somewhat rational logic here. I own two pitbulls. There both great dogs and I trust them 100% around other people. However, if they ever perceived someone hurting a family member, there would be carnage.
Dumb as a rock.
Emma Coburn to miss Olympic Trials after breaking ankle in Suzhou
Jakob on Oly 1500- “Walk in the park if I don’t get injured or sick”
VALBY has graduated (w/ honors) from Florida, will she go to grad school??
NY Times: Treadmill desks might really be worth it. Does anyone use one?
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion