NO MORE RABBITS IN ZURICH!!

Other Running Related Topic

Page 4 of 4

1 3 4

Next Last

17 years ago 01/23/2007 4:53pm EST

re: hillrunner62

hillrunner62 wrote:
It's really a matter of opinion and what you like to watch more. Personally I would rather watch an evenly paced WR or WR attempt than a 5000 meter race won by Bekele in 13:17.

Neither would I. But I'd rather see Bekele win in 12.55 with several more under 13 (in a tactical race) than watch yet another boorish 1500m WR "attempt" get strung out with a 54 first lap then watch the pace fall away.

To be quite honest, alot of the World Record races are dull (exception of El G in the mile vs Ngeny). I would rather watch an olympic final than a WR any day.

I'm not sure why people believe all the races are going to be so slow anyway. The likes of Webb will know if they want to win they will have to get things moving along to take the sting out of the fast finishers. If anyone has seen Filbert Bayi race then they will know the excitement of a non-rabited, fast 1500m

17 years ago 01/23/2007 5:28pm EST

re: two

It's been 33 years and the world has never seen another Filbert emerge yet. I doubt some rule changes are going to make the next Filbert appear any time soon.

"Comfort must not be expected by folks that go a pleasuring."

17 years ago 01/23/2007 7:50pm EST

re: MAYEROFF

I think that we're all missing the point here. What it comes down to is responsibility. Who is responsible for the following; 1) paying the athletes 2) ensure a good, competetive field 3) incentives for running fast.

Is it the responsibility of the meet director to put together a good field that results in a fast time? Or is it the responsibility of the Golden League format to ensure that the athletes are paid for performing well?

My take is that the race directors' number one priority is to provide a forum for athletes to be paid. So the move to prize money only is a good thing. No more rabbits.

It is the responsibility of formats like the Golden League to ensure a good field by offering incentives to show up at every race. I think that they accomplished this somewhat by adding that second tier for people who fell one short of winning all 6. They could add a third tier.

So with that being said the third leg of the stool is incentives to produce fast times. This has to be the responsibility of the athletes. If they run fast they will be rewarded through prize money, endorsements, access to prettier women. If the runners want to run fast they will bring their own rabbits, or their agents will bring them.

So in summation...as long as they move it along in a holistic way, it will suck at first (Bek winning in 13:17) and get better with age (Bek winning in 12:45)

17 years ago 01/24/2007 11:41am EST

re: dumdum

dumdum wrote:
running sub-13 and finishing 6th doesn't mean as much as running 13:12 and winning against a very good field. The latter will give you confidence going into the Olympics or WC.

The person who runs sub 13 finsihing 6th will still likely finish 6th against the same field in a race that is won in 13:12.

He will likely finish closer to the winner and the race will look more exciting but the rabbitted race would show how much better the winner is than the 6th place finisher.

As a fan I want to see a good race. As a runner I want to run as fast as I can.

We all love to see Cram against Aouita going after 3:29 or El G vs Ngeny going after 3:43.

Page 4 of 4

1 3 4

Next Last

Reply Replying to

Username

Password

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

Post Preview

By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.

Remember me on this device.

NO MORE RABBITS IN ZURICH!!

Of General Interest

This thread has already been deleted.

You have been subscribed.

NO MORE RABBITS IN ZURICH!!

Jump To A Page

Follow Jefe in the CO

Block Jefe in the CO

Follow toro

Block toro

Jump To A Page

Of General Interest

This thread has already been deleted.

Reply Replying to

You have been subscribed.