Apparently they are not so difficult to perform the job "AI prompt engineer " if you have good command over language and in ur fieldq: arts, science etc etc . But looks like these jobs won't be around forever once the machines are fully developed , or I may be wrong . Mostly done remotely .
If anyone of you got into one of these can you guide on job hunting process ?
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
you're kind of chuckling about it but you're assuming the AI is efficient -- which is intermittent at current levels -- and that the AI isn't distorted for profit like many current search engines. you know, you make a sincere prompt to google and it really tries to push you towards sponsored links or commercial results. that and some people know how to say things to get results back from computers or databases, and some don't.
there is also a developing expertise in indirectly figuring out the restrictions on AI searches and coming up with workarounds.
Had so much fun chatting with my good friends Trenton Bricken and Sholto Douglas on the podcast.No way to summarize it, except: This is the best context dump...
you're kind of chuckling about it but you're assuming the AI is efficient -- which is intermittent at current levels -- and that the AI isn't distorted for profit like many current search engines. you know, you make a sincere prompt to google and it really tries to push you towards sponsored links or commercial results. that and some people know how to say things to get results back from computers or databases, and some don't.
there is also a developing expertise in indirectly figuring out the restrictions on AI searches and coming up with workarounds.
The future sounds exciting , wonder how many new jobs appear . Hope i read right ,however am taking about the GPTs , which are simply a specific version ( for example a special ChatGPT for specific subject) instead of the general ChatGPT that is out . So these developers want to hire prompters to fix the inconsistency that shows up in these GPTs so they hire people from various backgrounds to promt to the machine and make it better. Instead of coding and correcting the software , now you just chat with the machine and do some very minor coding work . Anyway scary concept is they still don't know how the ChatGPT is performing like it has some kind of human understanding. During their developmental process they were shocked when ChatGPT started responding better than other softwares that were programmed specifically to a certain subject.
the way to stave off AI is be sufficiently expert and knowledgeable in your field you can't be beat by a websearch. if you are brighter and know more than the machine, you use it and are leveraged into a multiple of yourself. if you are content to skate by, don't know the nuances of your field that can't be absorbed scrapeing the internet, make dumb gung-ho decisions, the computer will take your job.
well, i should nuance that. i understand some companies are trying to bring checkers back. people using u-check-out devices are slow and prone to theft. but a computer may run the numbers and tell them that.
make sensible, non-John Wayne decisions. don't be at some massive business with tons of data where the computer can better calculate the next step than you can.