Lululemon is Ruining Running

Thor\'s Sub wrote:

Don't get me wrong, I love lululemon shorts and shirts for casual wear and the occasional gym work out. But Lululmeon has sponsored three of the most annoying personalities in T&F. Niki Hilitz (Self explanatory), Colleen Quigley (very obnoxious woke posts) and Tara Davis (way too much, could she not land a legit sponsor in T&F?) What is their motive? Is it simply that they support woke narratives or are they legitimately trying to get into T&F?

Thor\'s Sub wrote:

Don't get me wrong, I love lululemon shorts and shirts for casual wear and the occasional gym work out. But Lululmeon has sponsored three of the most annoying personalities in T&F. Niki Hilitz (Self explanatory), Colleen Quigley (very obnoxious woke posts) and Tara Davis (way too much, could she not land a legit sponsor in T&F?) What is their motive? Is it simply that they support woke narratives or are they legitimately trying to get into T&F?

BYUBoy wrote:

I wholeheartedly agree that this kind of woke pro- transgender and homosexual stuff is dangerous and damaging running. Especially considering that kids get involved in running as early as middle school it's dangerous to expose them to LGBTQ ideology so young before they have a sense of wh they are. They just see "wow all these famous people are getting money to be gay" + peer pressure from seeing their friends and characters in TV shows doing it. So they permanently disfigure their bodies or have sex with their same sex which can out them at high risk for deadly STDs. All that even if you don't belive in God or that homosexuality and transexuality are sins.

Thor's Sub wrote:

Don't get me wrong, I love lululemon shorts and shirts for casual wear and the occasional gym work out. But Lululmeon has sponsored three of the most annoying personalities in T&F. Niki Hilitz (Self explanatory), Colleen Quigley (very obnoxious woke posts) and Tara Davis (way too much, could she not land a legit sponsor in T&F?) What is their motive? Is it simply that they support woke narratives or are they legitimately trying to get into T&F?

Coach Coach wrote:

Anyone willing to pay track athletes is a win for track. Tara Davis-Woodhall has been very successful and she will always get a lot of screen time. She has a great personality and backs it up with her performance on the field. If you don't like the direction LuLu Lemon is going just don't buy their stuff.

Thor\'s Sub wrote:

Nikki is fine, she is truly a very talented female runner. Her social media is obviously biased to a certain crowd (to an annoying level). She goes after anyone and everyone who wont play mental gymnastics to keep up with pronouns.

Thor\'s Sub wrote:

SeaBeDee wrote:

Their motive is to ruin running for b*gots like you :)

Just a legitimate question about Lululemon's involvement in T&F.... their sponsorships seem motivated by more than performance, more towards marketing.

daddaddad wrote:

I agree with you but I think the 1 thing that all 3 have in common is that they all think they are worth more than major companies are willing to pay

what a snowflake wrote:

Thor\'s Sub wrote:

Don't get me wrong, I love lululemon shorts and shirts for casual wear and the occasional gym work out. But Lululmeon has sponsored three of the most annoying personalities in T&F. Niki Hilitz (Self explanatory), Colleen Quigley (very obnoxious woke posts) and Tara Davis (way too much, could she not land a legit sponsor in T&F?) What is their motive? Is it simply that they support woke narratives or are they legitimately trying to get into T&F?

This ruins running for you? Like when you go for a run today, you aren’t going to enjoy it as a result of the mere existence of this company that you are in no way required to patronize or even think about?

You’re a special kind of sensitive, aren’t you?

*Au Contraire* wrote:

The woke thing is secondary to the class of person to whom they are trying to market.

They sell overpriced running clothing that attempts to be fashionable, rather than purely functional.

Who can, and will, buy such things? Upper-middle class people who are status obsessed. This tends to also be the most woke demographic.

bye bye bigots wrote:

daddaddad wrote:

I agree with you but I think the 1 thing that all 3 have in common is that they all think they are worth more than major companies are willing to pay

If you believe in free markets, they are by definition "worth" exactly what they can get, and any company unwilling to pay this has undervalued them.

Duh.

come out of the closet wrote:

You're deeply in the closet, BYUBoy. You post a lot about the "sins" of homosexuality. Normally those that are as outspoken about things as much as you are, are speaking out about something that they are or are guilty of. You know the stories about people that make a big thing about pedophilia only to be busted for having a large cache of pedophilia on their home computer and phones? You seem a lot like those people.

BYUBoy wrote:

come out of the closet wrote:

You're deeply in the closet, BYUBoy. You post a lot about the "sins" of homosexuality. Normally those that are as outspoken about things as much as you are, are speaking out about something that they are or are guilty of. You know the stories about people that make a big thing about pedophilia only to be busted for having a large cache of pedophilia on their home computer and phones? You seem a lot like those people.

Sigh. I'm like a broken record here.

Nobody is gay. I've neve had homosexual relations. I am a heterosexual. I have dated several women and plan to marry a woman soon and raise a family. I honor God, I respect my body, I fight Satan with faith.