Apparently you can and did say -- you wanted to "vacate" fourellI know nothing can stop you in doing so weeks ago, and said as much, but you stayed apparently because you see yourself as a puppet with me pulling the strings.
Since you are only here because I am and you have said nothing except in response to me you are clearly confused about whose strings are being pulled.
And you, why are you here?
Calling any good athlete a doper. Then fighting in any thread and ignoring any argument. All of this at age 65+.
I know nothing can stop you in doing so. Just continue until age 80. Bravo.
Since you are only here because I am and you have said nothing except in response to me you are clearly confused about whose strings are being pulled.
And you, why are you here?
Calling any good athlete a doper. Then fighting in any thread and ignoring any argument. All of this at age 65+.
I know nothing can stop you in doing so. Just continue until age 80. Bravo.
I presented a view, with my reasons. It drew the doping deniers out of the woodwork. No - their views didn't convince. But you might address the question you asked me - why are YOU here?
Calling any good athlete a doper. Then fighting in any thread and ignoring any argument. All of this at age 65+.
I know nothing can stop you in doing so. Just continue until age 80. Bravo.
I presented a view, with my reasons. It drew the doping deniers out of the woodwork. No - their views didn't convince. But you might address the question you asked me - why are YOU here?
Why is it remarkable that an Olympic 1500 Champ has ran a time that was done over 35 years ago?
It is not remarkable. Not at all. The wunderkind is wunderfully full of the right wunderful stuff.
Actually, it IS remarkable. We are all remarking on it. Also, Only five others have run faster, which is also remarkable. Or would you prefer that it's notable? It's clear that running at this level is rare...with or without EPO and/or advancements in technology.