They took a 100 plus page inventory of items not related to their warrant (signed off on by a magistrate judge who recused himself in the Trump v. Clinton case because he felt he could not be impartial) when they raided Mar-a-Lago and asked that the cameras be turned off and no counsel be allowed to supervise their search. Does that sound like a legal search and seizure to you?
They took a 100 plus page inventory of items not related to their warrant (signed off on by a magistrate judge who recused himself in the Trump v. Clinton case because he felt he could not be impartial) when they raided Mar-a-Lago and asked that the cameras be turned off and no counsel be allowed to supervise their search. Does that sound like a legal search and seizure to you?
It is a legal search. No attorneys are required.
If the police search your home for drugs and find none but they find child porn on your computer you cannot claim that you cannot be prosecuted for being a pedo.
They took a 100 plus page inventory of items not related to their warrant (signed off on by a magistrate judge who recused himself in the Trump v. Clinton case because he felt he could not be impartial) when they raided Mar-a-Lago and asked that the cameras be turned off and no counsel be allowed to supervise their search. Does that sound like a legal search and seizure to you?
Hold on. Who told you that Trump's counsel couldn't be present during the search warrant?
Was it the same guy who told you the cameras were turned off? The have a subpoena pending on the cameras.
They took a 100 plus page inventory of items not related to their warrant (signed off on by a magistrate judge who recused himself in the Trump v. Clinton case because he felt he could not be impartial) when they raided Mar-a-Lago and asked that the cameras be turned off and no counsel be allowed to supervise their search. Does that sound like a legal search and seizure to you?
Hold on. Who told you that Trump's counsel couldn't be present during the search warrant?
Was it the same guy who told you the cameras were turned off? The have a subpoena pending on the cameras.
If the police show up at a house with a warrant to search, and the owner says "hold on, don't start until my lawyer shows up to supervise", I'm guessing the police will laugh at the home owner. They have a warrant to search. Any talk of 'counsel not being allowed to supervise the search' is a red herring.
They took a 100 plus page inventory of items not related to their warrant (signed off on by a magistrate judge who recused himself in the Trump v. Clinton case because he felt he could not be impartial) when they raided Mar-a-Lago and asked that the cameras be turned off and no counsel be allowed to supervise their search. Does that sound like a legal search and seizure to you?
They took a 100 plus page inventory of items not related to their warrant (signed off on by a magistrate judge who recused himself in the Trump v. Clinton case because he felt he could not be impartial) when they raided Mar-a-Lago and asked that the cameras be turned off and no counsel be allowed to supervise their search. Does that sound like a legal search and seizure to you?
This sounds like someone who would put on a beauty pageant, then barge in on the barely legal contestants while they are in their dressing room changing.