Except you sincerely believe this, as you have been arguing this on your podcast.
Except you sincerely believe this, as you have been arguing this on your podcast.
Did not realize you could reduce the ban by 50% with an admission of guilt. I guess if that doesn’t move the needle nothing will. SH could have walked away with 2 years if she just fessed up from the start? Omertà! The public loves to give second chances if the cheater confesses bears their soul. I guess if the athlete has no chance of being competitive without doping it lessens any incentive to ever tell the truth.
At this point, it would be really positive for Shelby to go silent and stay out of the spotlight for the next few years. The entire burrito story was a lie, a joke. Same as stolen election lies. Give it up, move on Shel. There are no more appeals or lawsuits to pursue.
I get that you are joking, but this is so awkward, because it's like you--and maybe even Shelby IDK believe that people who don't support her "hate" her. But what we are in support of is clean sport. And it's really super awkward that you kind of don't seem to understand the difference.
Wouldn't be a good look.
Its one thing to be a doper, the other to be a liar and a cheat.
LA was a doper, and received sympathy until he was exposed as a liar who treated his team mates and friends like excrement.
I get that you are joking, but this is so awkward, because it's like you--and maybe even Shelby IDK believe that people who don't support her "hate" her. But what we are in support of is clean sport. And it's really super awkward that you kind of don't seem to understand the difference.
heres the thing... she's guilty.
Her claim does not hold up and she puts absolutely no effort into proving her case scientifically.
A main part of her claim is that she'd never even heard of nandrolene before. Okay great shelby, but you can't prove whether that statement is true or not so it doesn't help you.
I feel like she just made a claim and then had to run with it even though it didn't make sense.
Why would she win an appeal when she has presented literally no new evidence to help her case. Did she think that they were just going to change their minds out of the goodness of their hearts?
Then she wants her fans to pay for her legal bills. I believed her at the beginning but at this point the evidence is against her and shes just annoying me.
Someone who believes her, please help me understand why you think she isn't guilty.
Shelby Houlihan was obviously doping. Everyone at Bowerman, including the coaches, is aware of that.
They are also aware that Houlihan could have gotten her ban reduced from 4 years down to 2 years for ratting out the coaches, her teammates, and whoever else was involved in giving her the banned drugs, or in taking the banned drugs themselves.
There was obviously some kind of deal cut with Houlihan. "If you go along with the 4 year ban, and don't rat on anyone, we will do ____________ ." What the blank is exactly, I don't know. Maybe some combination of extra money and agreeing to publically support her crazy burrito excuse. But whatever it was it had to be pretty good for Houlihan to stay quiet.
What is WADA’s random testing protocol for banned athletes like SH? Is it the same as competing ones, more stringent, or less so? Presumably the system is set up to disincentivize a banned athlete from using the time to dope and rest assured that it will clear their body by the end of their ban?
Teller of Truth wrote:
Shelby Houlihan was obviously doping. Everyone at Bowerman, including the coaches, is aware of that.
They are also aware that Houlihan could have gotten her ban reduced from 4 years down to 2 years for ratting out the coaches, her teammates, and whoever else was involved in giving her the banned drugs, or in taking the banned drugs themselves.
There was obviously some kind of deal cut with Houlihan. "If you go along with the 4 year ban, and don't rat on anyone, we will do ____________ ." What the blank is exactly, I don't know. Maybe some combination of extra money and agreeing to publically support her crazy burrito excuse. But whatever it was it had to be pretty good for Houlihan to stay quiet.
For the greater good of the sport there should be more flexibility with Shelby’s “sentence” to expose the entire rotten enterprise, IF true. A lesson needs to be learned from federal prosecutors about how to dismantle a corrupt enterprise. This is how you end doping in T&F….
She could have signed an NDA in return for Nike continuing to pay her during her suspension. Idle speculation, but possible.
Teller of Truth wrote:
Shelby Houlihan was obviously doping. Everyone at Bowerman, including the coaches, is aware of that.
They are also aware that Houlihan could have gotten her ban reduced from 4 years down to 2 years for ratting out the coaches, her teammates, and whoever else was involved in giving her the banned drugs, or in taking the banned drugs themselves.
There was obviously some kind of deal cut with Houlihan. "If you go along with the 4 year ban, and don't rat on anyone, we will do ____________ ." What the blank is exactly, I don't know. Maybe some combination of extra money and agreeing to publically support her crazy burrito excuse. But whatever it was it had to be pretty good for Houlihan to stay quiet.
Perhaps, but I’d imagine BTC as an institution would be smart enough to not leave any evidence of their involvement in which case SH could’ve been risking both the 4-year ban and a “he said she said” accusation against BTC ensuring not only that she doesn’t get any help from them but also permanently alienating the most influential track club in the country.
Every LetsRun thread ever on the Shelby Houlihan case:
Headline: Houlihan says something or posts something online or news breaks making her look worse.
Poster 1: Good riddance
Poster 2: Burrito joke
Rojo: ambivalent comment where he says he's not supporting Shelby but still comes across like he is supporting her.
Poster 3: she's covering for Nike/BTC. They're all dirty!
Poster 4: I think she's dirty but the rest of the team is clean.
Astro: all top athletes are dirty
Random guy who knows nothing: I bet she's still doping while banned! They should test her now
Poster 5: tells random guy who knows nothing how banned athletes are in fact still in the doping pool.
Poster 6: why doesn't anyone in BTC speak up, do they not care about clean sport?
We are just a day or two away from this devolving into a 40 page thread of rekrunner, armstronglivs, and a made just for the thread pseudonym who always uses the same logic, all to start arguing over the semantics of whether Houlihan is a doper/a drug cheat, and the details of the CAS case.
Bonus points for guest appearance from Keith Moulton.
Let me know if I missed anything.
bluh wrote:
Perhaps, but I’d imagine BTC as an institution would be smart enough to not leave any evidence of their involvement in which case SH could’ve been risking both the 4-year ban and a “he said she said” accusation against BTC ensuring not only that she doesn’t get any help from them but also permanently alienating the most influential track club in the country.
Confounding variable on a full blown Nike cover up is the Staffords leaving and absolutely letting rip on the situation on the way out making the team/Shelby look horrific in the process and unlike with people who left NOP and bad mouthed it, Nike has been totally silent. Both sisters seem to still be happily sponsored by Nike. Makes me think if there was something fishy going on it was specifically within the team without involvement/possible collateral damage to the swoosh. Otherwise there'd be more concern over how this has gone down. Almost seems like they don't mind if Shelby/Jerry look bad - itself wouldn't be surprising given Alberto's hatred of Schumacher and the rumours of Phil Knight always favoring NOP over BTC.
Another perspective wrote:
Every LetsRun thread ever on the Shelby Houlihan case:
Headline: Houlihan says something or posts something online or news breaks making her look worse.
Poster 1: Good riddance
Poster 2: Burrito joke
Rojo: ambivalent comment where he says he's not supporting Shelby but still comes across like he is supporting her.
Poster 3: she's covering for Nike/BTC. They're all dirty!
Poster 4: I think she's dirty but the rest of the team is clean.
Astro: all top athletes are dirty
Random guy who knows nothing: I bet she's still doping while banned! They should test her now
Poster 5: tells random guy who knows nothing how banned athletes are in fact still in the doping pool.
Poster 6: why doesn't anyone in BTC speak up, do they not care about clean sport?
We are just a day or two away from this devolving into a 40 page thread of rekrunner, armstronglivs, and a made just for the thread pseudonym who always uses the same logic, all to start arguing over the semantics of whether Houlihan is a doper/a drug cheat, and the details of the CAS case.
Bonus points for guest appearance from Keith Moulton.
Let me know if I missed anything.
One more thing. I'll chime in eventually expressing my annoyance with rekrunner, Armstronglivs and liar soorer repeating the exact same things that they have already written a thousand times each. They will ban the current liar soorer sock puppet, delete my comments as thread-derailing and liar soorers new handle, rekrunner and Armstronglivs will be free to get back at it for another few dozen pages.
bluh wrote:
Perhaps, but I’d imagine BTC as an institution would be smart enough to not leave any evidence of their involvement in which case SH could’ve been risking both the 4-year ban and a “he said she said” accusation against BTC ensuring not only that she doesn’t get any help from them but also permanently alienating the most influential track club in the country.
No, how you do it is that you publicly acknowledge SH’s story and reinstate her, however in secret you exchange her “exoneration” for her going back to BTC and collecting evidence, essentially “wearing a wire” if not literally, then figuratively. Honestly, if the authorities were serious about eliminating doping, it could be done. I’m still confused why suspected doping by any athlete who competes on US soil is not a federal crime and more vigorously pursued? Is the Rodchenkov Act good or bad? The public is being defrauded and money stolen. Please educate me if I’m off base, but what goes on now seems feckless and feeble.
astro wrote:
The vicious cycle here is that the same logic can apply both for Houlihan and against her as she was being simultaneously cheated by athletes cheating better than she did at the same time she cheated others.
You’re making assumptions and forming conclusions to rationalize her cheating. Pathetic.
She is not a victim. She is a cheat.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Another 50 pages coming from the doping apologists arguing the injustice of the system and that it was "possible" she doped accidentally. And pigs can fly. (When they aren't being consumed in an offal burrito).
you’re the only idiot who reads or responds to those posts.
Another perspective wrote:
We are just a day or two away from this devolving into a 40 page thread of rekrunner, armstronglivs, and a made just for the thread pseudonym who always uses the same logic, all to start arguing over the semantics of whether Houlihan is a doper/a drug cheat, and the details of the CAS case.
Bonus points for guest appearance from Keith Moulton.
Let me know if I missed anything.
Since there is really no new evidence, nothing really changes -- I'll sit this thread out unless something of real world substance comes up. Echo away.
I have to say the continued denial of the facts makes it so much worse for her. It also makes me suspicious of the rest of BTC which isn't fair.
That said I just caught up on the article about GDS departure. Totally support that decision but she couldn't understand why she wasn't allowed to read privileged communication between anti-doping and Houlihan's lawyers?
What planet are these athletes living on?