Watching you Nazi pumpers argue about battles, while losing overall, after Ukraine started this war, is rich. You are angry you're losing the war because you started it with Nazi fascists invading the Donbas before Russia was even there, April 2014. Your Nazi fascism is on 11.
-
26
-
flyingfrog wrote:
ceccione wrote:
You conceded the main points:
~ Ukraine stated the war (November 24th 2013 / April 2014)
~ Ukraine are Nazis
~ Ukraine is losing
~ Ukraine cities are being leveledGo hide in day-to-day battles. It's the safe haven for the moral low ground (CNN / Fox / MSNBC constipated sheeple).
More importantly are they doping?
Lots of chat / memes / posts about Z being a druggy. He's not winning though so no worries. He runs 8 * 20m for cash begging pretty fast though.
This post was edited 7 minutes after it was posted.16 -
Russia doesn't want Ukraine. Western Ukraine is all Nazi territory. No thanks.
Russia just wants to beat Ukraine up real bad for being a Donbas invading, fascist, ethnic cleansing Nazi state...
16 -
City leveled.
16 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Putin The Nazi War Criminal wrote:
Not that far off from US estimates of 17.5k Ukrainian KIA. Despite your wishes, the Russian army is just not that effective and will never attrite the Ukrainian army as long as NATO countries continue to support Ukraine with a fraction of their military budget.
Tell that to Bakhmut or the 2k+ Ukrainians who died in the counter-offensive this past week trying to save it.
Artillery is very effective at killing people no matter how fancy their weapons are or who's paying their bills.
There is zero chance that Russia has killed 2k+ Ukrainians in the last week. Source?
31 -
I seriously doubt
Anyone in Russia cares about your nazi fixation. The Russians had every intention of taking over Ukraine, they just can't do it wih that sad sack army they have,'
Russians can't fight we all see it, Ukraine wins this,
Sure a lot of this out there,,,,
Did the Ukrainian Army Kill 1,100 Russians In A Single Day? It’s Certainly Possible.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.22 -
Monkeys Skyping wrote:
no__deal wrote:
The US couldn't take Afghanistan and they literally are cavemen with AK-47s.
The US took Afghan militarily in a month or two.
What they failed at was having any idea what to do with it as an occupying force for the next 20 years.
Your post is silly if you think about it.
You are assuming winning battles is taking a country.
A nation has to be able to run a country, Law & Order. The victor has to establish entirely different set of morals and ethics.
If you cannot run a country, you never took the country.
Haven't you heard:Winning hearts & minds
16 -
Cold War Warrior16 wrote:
Monkeys Skyping wrote:
The US took Afghan militarily in a month or two.
What they failed at was having any idea what to do with it as an occupying force for the next 20 years.
Your post is silly if you think about it.
You are assuming winning battles is taking a country.
A nation has to be able to run a country, Law & Order. The victor has to establish entirely different set of morals and ethics.
If you cannot run a country, you never took the country.
Haven't you heard:Winning hearts & minds
You really don't understand the difference of conquering a country, removing the government from power, versus occupying and trying to administer a country? Wow! Ok.
Russia has failed to do even do that first step.
In 20 years that the the US was in Afghanistan we lost 2,402 servicemen KIA. Russia losses that in a matter of days. So, go ahead, keep making comparisons between the US and Russian military. The difference is night and day.
41 -
Mel_Rnr wrote:
You really don't understand the difference of conquering a country, removing the government from power, versus occupying and trying to administer a country? Wow! Ok.
Russia has failed to do even do that first step.
In 20 years that the the US was in Afghanistan we lost 2,402 servicemen KIA. Russia losses that in a matter of days. So, go ahead, keep making comparisons between the US and Russian military. The difference is night and day.
Odd that you would compare cavemen with AK-47s to NATO trained and commanded Ukrainian army with NATO intel and weapons.
Ukrainian army is one of the strongest in the world at the moment. And they still can't get Russia out of Donbas and Crimea.
I'm calling negotations in september.
16 -
no__deal wrote:
Mel_Rnr wrote:
You really don't understand the difference of conquering a country, removing the government from power, versus occupying and trying to administer a country? Wow! Ok.
Russia has failed to do even do that first step.
In 20 years that the the US was in Afghanistan we lost 2,402 servicemen KIA. Russia losses that in a matter of days. So, go ahead, keep making comparisons between the US and Russian military. The difference is night and day.
Odd that you would compare cavemen with AK-47s to NATO trained and commanded Ukrainian army with NATO intel and weapons.
Ukrainian army is one of the strongest in the world at the moment. And they still can't get Russia out of Donbas and Crimea.
I'm calling negotations in september.
What do we think, Russians booted from Bakhmut by the end of July, or sooner? Will it be a complete rout or will they claim it's another goodwill gesture?
So you're saying that Russia has completely failed to "demilitarize" Ukraine? Wasn't that one of their main objectives? Is Russia the most embarrassing Nazi-infested sh*thole of a country or is Russia the most disgusting Nazi-infested sh*thole of a country?
42 -
no__deal wrote:
Mel_Rnr wrote:
You really don't understand the difference of conquering a country, removing the government from power, versus occupying and trying to administer a country? Wow! Ok.
Russia has failed to do even do that first step.
In 20 years that the the US was in Afghanistan we lost 2,402 servicemen KIA. Russia losses that in a matter of days. So, go ahead, keep making comparisons between the US and Russian military. The difference is night and day.
Odd that you would compare cavemen with AK-47s to NATO trained and commanded Ukrainian army with NATO intel and weapons.
Ukrainian army is one of the strongest in the world at the moment. And they still can't get Russia out of Donbas and Crimea.
I'm calling negotations in september.
Well, if the Ukrainian Army is so mighty now because of NATO weapons, training, and Intel, and yes they certainly have become a highly capable fighting force from all that, then obviously the US Army as the largest NATO army training and supplying them, is even more capable.
Any way you cut it, the Russian army has shown the world its ineptitude.
52 -
Hey cecci! Looks like Zelensky is coming to Japan. Say "Hi!" for us. Do you think you can get a picture with him?
60 -
Shoko Asahara wrote:
Hey cecci! Looks like Zelensky is coming to Japan. Say "Hi!" for us. Do you think you can get a picture with him?
With a huge chunk of the aid being stolen by corrupt Ukrainians before it reaches the troops Zelensky has come to beg for more.
16 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Shoko Asahara wrote:
Hey cecci! Looks like Zelensky is coming to Japan. Say "Hi!" for us. Do you think you can get a picture with him?
With a huge chunk of the aid being stolen by corrupt Ukrainians before it reaches the troops Zelensky has come to beg for more.
Source? Or are you saying that Ukraine is killing tens of thousands of Russian troops and shooting down the overwhelming majority of their missiles with only a fraction of the resources we're sending them? Damn, the Russian army is total sh*t. Sounds like it would be better for a few hundred thousand NATO troops to just kick Russia out of Ukraine once and for all and then decide if they stop advancing when they hit the border or if they march all the way to the Pacific Ocean.
p.s. Still waiting for your source that 2k+ Ukrainian troops were killed defending Bakhmut in the last week.
40 -
Cold War Warrior16 wrote:
Monkeys Skyping wrote:
The US took Afghan militarily in a month or two.
What they failed at was having any idea what to do with it as an occupying force for the next 20 years.
Your post is silly if you think about it.
You are assuming winning battles is taking a country.
A nation has to be able to run a country, Law & Order. The victor has to establish entirely different set of morals and ethics.
If you cannot run a country, you never took the country.
Haven't you heard:Winning hearts & minds
Congratulations on the single stup!dest post in the history of LRC!
Here's your prize:
40 -
Shoko Asahara wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
With a huge chunk of the aid being stolen by corrupt Ukrainians before it reaches the troops Zelensky has come to beg for more.
Source? Or are you saying that Ukraine is killing tens of thousands of Russian troops and shooting down the overwhelming majority of their missiles with only a fraction of the resources we're sending them? Damn, the Russian army is total sh*t. Sounds like it would be better for a few hundred thousand NATO troops to just kick Russia out of Ukraine once and for all and then decide if they stop advancing when they hit the border or if they march all the way to the Pacific Ocean.
p.s. Still waiting for your source that 2k+ Ukrainian troops were killed defending Bakhmut in the last week.
Source? Adult doesn't need sources. It's all so obvious to him. And anyone who doesn't see the obvious is obviously a moron.
30 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Shoko Asahara wrote:
Hey cecci! Looks like Zelensky is coming to Japan. Say "Hi!" for us. Do you think you can get a picture with him?
With a huge chunk of the aid being stolen by corrupt Ukrainians before it reaches the troops Zelensky has come to beg for more.
Russia estimates nearly 30% of its battlefield resources are stolen by corrupt Russians and sold to Hezbollah, etc. The Ukrainian theft rate, in contrast, is less than 2%. The stark difference in those statistics shows (1) the motivation of Ukrainian soldiers (the very existence of their country is at stake) and (2) anti-misuse technology in NATO weapons (Russia has no such technology).
20 -
Colin Bombo Harris wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
With a huge chunk of the aid being stolen by corrupt Ukrainians before it reaches the troops Zelensky has come to beg for more.
Russia estimates nearly 30% of its battlefield resources are stolen by corrupt Russians and sold to Hezbollah, etc. The Ukrainian theft rate, in contrast, is less than 2%. The stark difference in those statistics shows (1) the motivation of Ukrainian soldiers (the very existence of their country is at stake) and (2) anti-misuse technology in NATO weapons (Russia has no such technology).
Yes, and Ukrainians and Russians behave in exactly the same way.
02 -
Colin Bombo Harris wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
With a huge chunk of the aid being stolen by corrupt Ukrainians before it reaches the troops Zelensky has come to beg for more.
Russia estimates nearly 30% of its battlefield resources are stolen by corrupt Russians and sold to Hezbollah, etc. The Ukrainian theft rate, in contrast, is less than 2%. The stark difference in those statistics shows (1) the motivation of Ukrainian soldiers (the very existence of their country is at stake) and (2) anti-misuse technology in NATO weapons (Russia has no such technology).
The Putin lovers have been saying the aid will be stolen from the beginning. That talk has always been to weaken the public's support for such aid.
The reality of course, that we have all clearly seen and you and others have pointed out, is that Ukraine has been using all that military aid to effectively fight back against the Russian invaders.
20 -
Shoko Asahara wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
With a huge chunk of the aid being stolen by corrupt Ukrainians before it reaches the troops Zelensky has come to beg for more.
Source? Or are you saying that Ukraine is killing tens of thousands of Russian troops and shooting down the overwhelming majority of their missiles with only a fraction of the resources we're sending them? Damn, the Russian army is total sh*t. Sounds like it would be better for a few hundred thousand NATO troops to just kick Russia out of Ukraine once and for all and then decide if they stop advancing when they hit the border or if they march all the way to the Pacific Ocean.
p.s. Still waiting for your source that 2k+ Ukrainian troops were killed defending Bakhmut in the last week.
Just to be clear you refer to any pro-Ukrainian source as gospel and any pro-Russian source as propganda.
It's not possible to have a serious discussion with a cultist like yourself.
Do you find it at all strange that despite Ukraine's bottomless pockets and military skill and heroism that's unparalleled in human history they can't manage to push the most inept military in human history out of their country?
If you had an IQ even sniffing the mid 80s you might see how idiotic your position is.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.01
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun