Nice try. Truth never changes. Our pursuit to the truth, through scientific observation might change, but the end result truth never changes. The truth is, for covid, there has never been a deadly threat high enough to justify the mandates, lockdowns.
Even though there are nearly a million deaths in total and nearly two thousand in a day threads like this show that the real public crisis in the US today is one of endemic stupidity.
A new study estimates that 103 million Americans, or 31 percent of the U.S. population, had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 by the end of 2020. Researchers modeled the spread of the coronavirus, finding that fewer than one-quar...
Even though there are nearly a million deaths in total and nearly two thousand in a day threads like this show that the real public crisis in the US today is one of endemic stupidity.
Started right around 6 months out from a general presidential election and is ending about 6 months out from a midterm. Beware of the narrative/propaganda that will be on full display the next 6 months by current office holders. If there wasn’t an election, this wouldn’t be the end of it. Now they pause, and roll out the next iteration or level of this draconian nonsense.
Watch what happens this next fall/winter as people move inside more and get sick. Where there was no change in office, mask mandates will reemerge…or worse…count on it.
The lethality of Covid-19 had already declined significantly the very month the "vaccines" started to be rolled out. The infection fatality rate of 0.8% in Spring 2020 fell to 0.3% by December 2020, per the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University.
Having milked a drumbeat of fear and hysteria for all its worth, the establishment has moved to the next stage of the experiment, whatever that may be.
You are now challenging Steve The Addict for biggest moron poster.
These two a$$holes are exhausting. All I hear in my head when I see Steve and Dan M popping off is cry, cry, cry, b!tch, b!tch, b!tch. I don’t even know what they are upset about. That Covid is a thing? OR IS IT REALLY!?!?
The CDC's announcement came 4 days before the State of the Union address. In the event that the State of the Union address had happened on February 15, the CDC would have announced the exact same decision on February 11.
You don't think it has anything to do with the fact that both case numbers and hospitalizations are plummeting and are at the lowest they've been since late July/early August?
No, it doesn't. The CDC's "formulas" already reflect case and hospitalization rates. But mask mandates are unpopular now, so they had to change the magic formula and voila masks aren't recommended anymore.
The Democratic Party knows if it continued with its Nazi mask and vaccine mandates it would get destroyed again in November. The pressure of the people is doing what it should do in a democracy. Thank you Republicans!!! Without you we would be wearing hazmat suits and so full of big pharma injections that we would look like pin cushions.
You don't think it has anything to do with the fact that both case numbers and hospitalizations are plummeting and are at the lowest they've been since late July/early August?
No, it doesn't. The CDC's "formulas" already reflect case and hospitalization rates. But mask mandates are unpopular now, so they had to change the magic formula and voila masks aren't recommended anymore.
Countries that started pulling back restrictions in the past few weeks once their numbers fell after the Omicron wave:
Denmark
Norway
Sweden
UK
Estonia
Czech Republic
Greece
Spain
Portugal
France
Germany
Finland
Lithuania
Australia
Israel
Croatia
Iceland
New Zealand
Netherlands
Italy
It's crazy though. They all did it because of US partisan politics.
No, it doesn't. The CDC's "formulas" already reflect case and hospitalization rates. But mask mandates are unpopular now, so they had to change the magic formula and voila masks aren't recommended anymore.
Countries that started pulling back restrictions in the past few weeks once their numbers fell after the Omicron wave:
It's not the restrictions that changed. It's the formula, which was supposed to be neutral and based on science, that changed.
It's not the restrictions that changed. It's the formula, which was supposed to be neutral and based on science, that changed.
The "formula" is based on the threat assessment, which is based on things like cases and hospitalizations, but also how many people have been vaccinated, how many people have recently recovered from Covid, risk of hospitals being overwhelmed, spread of dangerous variants, etc. The formula changes as the data changes.
It's not the restrictions that changed. It's the formula, which was supposed to be neutral and based on science, that changed.
The "formula" is based on the threat assessment, which is based on things like cases and hospitalizations, but also how many people have been vaccinated, how many people have recently recovered from Covid, risk of hospitals being overwhelmed, spread of dangerous variants, etc. The formula changes as the data changes.
No. The formula itself doesn't change as the data changes. The CDC changed the formula, not the outcome of the formula.
The "formula" is based on the threat assessment, which is based on things like cases and hospitalizations, but also how many people have been vaccinated, how many people have recently recovered from Covid, risk of hospitals being overwhelmed, spread of dangerous variants, etc. The formula changes as the data changes.
No. The formula itself doesn't change as the data changes. The CDC changed the formula, not the outcome of the formula.
The formula changed in...
Denmark Norway Sweden UK Estonia Czech Republic Greece Spain Portugal France Germany Finland Lithuania Australia Israel Croatia Iceland New Zealand Netherlands Italy
...because the threat assessment changed because of Omicron.
Would you rather risk formulas change as information changes or that they always stay the same permanently? Are you unable to change your opinion as you receive new information? Is that how you live your life?
Would you rather risk formulas change as information changes or that they always stay the same permanently? Are you unable to change your opinion as you receive new information? Is that how you live your life?
After new information is received, go to Walgreens or CVS and have them use an empty syringe to suck the "vaccine" out of you.