Against what modern science holds, yours is the belief that requires proof. But then, science doesn't offer proof in support of either ignorance or prejudice.
One thing you do however demonstrate is that a given lack of intelligence is unimprovable.
Against what modern science holds, yours is the belief that requires proof. But then, science doesn't offer proof in support of either ignorance or prejudice.
One thing you do however demonstrate is that a given lack of intelligence is unimprovable.
toxico wrote:
Obi Mike Kenobi wrote:
All you've given is blather. You're also using your definition of common sense as a universally accepted premise. Not everyone has to accept your definition as the starting point.
I certainly don't.
Welcome to the debate, Johnny come lately. Read my plentiful posts on scientific data analysis and review of papers on the topic proposed by the idiot Lance fanboy.
Am glad you agree with me that no one needs to accept anyone’s definition of common sense. Scientists have a more systematic method than “common sense”.
Give me a break, dude. All you're actually trying to do is railroad an opinion that you feel that minorities are dumber than whites by genetic disposition. You know that it's racist to do so, so you're creating this pseudo -professional tapdancing masquerade of wayward articles while not admitting to the deep -seated racism that fuels your claim.
Start there first.
Obi Mike Kenobi wrote:
toxico wrote:
Welcome to the debate, Johnny come lately. Read my plentiful posts on scientific data analysis and review of papers on the topic proposed by the idiot Lance fanboy.
Am glad you agree with me that no one needs to accept anyone’s definition of common sense. Scientists have a more systematic method than “common sense”.
Give me a break, dude. All you're actually trying to do is railroad an opinion that you feel that minorities are dumber than whites by genetic disposition. You know that it's racist to do so, so you're creating this pseudo -professional tapdancing masquerade of wayward articles while not admitting to the deep -seated racism that fuels your claim.
Start there first.
He ends there. He has nothing more to offer.
baa baa wool wrote:
run_INXS wrote:
wtf happened to this thread?
People offered examples of why Letsrun is considered toxic, mods deleted them, and Ward came in wanting to masturbatorially argue an irrelevant tangent, further showing why LRC is considered toxic.
The connection to OP is that these are topics allowing for nuanced discussion. A poster called “black runner” said you’d never discuss such topics with black people on a run. Intelligent people capable of nuance comfortably discuss them, irrespective of the color of their skin.
People incapable of nuance get all pissypantsy about it.
Obi Mike Kenobi wrote:
toxico wrote:
Welcome to the debate, Johnny come lately. Read my plentiful posts on scientific data analysis and review of papers on the topic proposed by the idiot Lance fanboy.
Am glad you agree with me that no one needs to accept anyone’s definition of common sense. Scientists have a more systematic method than “common sense”.
Give me a break, dude. All you're actually trying to do is railroad an opinion that you feel that minorities are dumber than whites by genetic disposition. You know that it's racist to do so, so you're creating this pseudo -professional tapdancing masquerade of wayward articles while not admitting to the deep -seated racism that fuels your claim.
Start there first.
Are you incapable of reading comprehension. I don’t think minorities are dumber than whites. Maybe you do and it’s showing.
toxico wrote:
baa baa wool wrote:
People offered examples of why Letsrun is considered toxic, mods deleted them, and Ward came in wanting to masturbatorially argue an irrelevant tangent, further showing why LRC is considered toxic.
The connection to OP is that these are topics allowing for nuanced discussion. A poster called “black runner” said you’d never discuss such topics with black people on a run. Intelligent people capable of nuance comfortably discuss them, irrespective of the color of their skin.
People incapable of nuance get all pissypantsy about it.
Quite the contrary - I don’t mind your irrelevant stroke-job that provides answers to the OP, at all. Carry on.
toxico wrote:
Obi Mike Kenobi wrote:
Give me a break, dude. All you're actually trying to do is railroad an opinion that you feel that minorities are dumber than whites by genetic disposition. You know that it's racist to do so, so you're creating this pseudo -professional tapdancing masquerade of wayward articles while not admitting to the deep -seated racism that fuels your claim.
Start there first.
Are you incapable of reading comprehension. I don’t think minorities are dumber than whites. Maybe you do and it’s showing.
You are the only one who is creating a discernible color line here.
What you are calling "nuance" is a careful smokescreen for what you're actually doing, which is judging. Judgment is not that high on the Bloom's scale. Until you viably delve into the analysis,synthesis and evaluation levels, you don't really have a true assessment. You have a claim.
toxico wrote:Intelligent people capable of nuance comfortably discuss them, irrespective of the color of their skin. People incapable of nuance get all pissypantsy about it.
So you are suggesting that only intelligent people should be comfortable with the discussion about white folks being generally smarter than black folks? Got it. Maybe I had it wrong all along. Maybe the KKK was just a Mensa group out trick or treating.
SurverySays wrote:
toxico wrote:Intelligent people capable of nuance comfortably discuss them, irrespective of the color of their skin. People incapable of nuance get all pissypantsy about it.
So you are suggesting that only intelligent people should be comfortable with the discussion about white folks being generally smarter than black folks? Got it. Maybe I had it wrong all along. Maybe the KKK was just a Mensa group out trick or treating.
No, that’s not the discussion point. And that’s why you are not one of the intelligent capable of nuance.
SurverySays wrote:
toxico wrote:Intelligent people capable of nuance comfortably discuss them, irrespective of the color of their skin. People incapable of nuance get all pissypantsy about it.
So you are suggesting that only intelligent people should be comfortable with the discussion about white folks being generally smarter than black folks? Got it. Maybe I had it wrong all along. Maybe the KKK was just a Mensa group out trick or treating.
Just because you're uncomfortable with reality does not change it. You don't have to be a racist, by hating black people and think they're inherently inferior, to point out the blatantly obvious fact that they score lower on valid measures of intelligence on average.
Obi Mike Kenobi wrote:
toxico wrote:
Are you incapable of reading comprehension. I don’t think minorities are dumber than whites. Maybe you do and it’s showing.
You are the only one who is creating a discernible color line here.
What you are calling "nuance" is a careful smokescreen for what you're actually doing, which is judging. Judgment is not that high on the Bloom's scale. Until you viably delve into the analysis,synthesis and evaluation levels, you don't really have a true assessment. You have a claim.
It’s always amusing when people are caught wrong on their feet to see them devolve into blather like above. You are wrong that I think minorities are dumber than white people. I don’t. Never said it. Never implied it. Never alluded to it. Explicitly denied believing in it. You were clearly mistaken but don’t know what else to fight about because, presumably, you can’t read.
baa baa wool wrote:
toxico wrote:
The connection to OP is that these are topics allowing for nuanced discussion. A poster called “black runner” said you’d never discuss such topics with black people on a run. Intelligent people capable of nuance comfortably discuss them, irrespective of the color of their skin.
People incapable of nuance get all pissypantsy about it.
Quite the contrary - I don’t mind your irrelevant stroke-job that provides answers to the OP, at all. Carry on.
I don’t disagree on the masturbatory characterization. A lot of masturbation is intellectual and vice versa.
This post was removed.
This post was removed.
This post was removed.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06