figgo wrote:
Oh good.
Now we need a booster every 12 days.
The Unkle wrote:
figgo wrote:
Oh good.
Now we need a booster every 12 days.
Daily boosters are on your way soon!
OP is a moron and we've been here before.
Remember when everyone was like " the CDC says the shots don't work for more than a month!!1" when we only had 1 MONTH of data?
That's exactly what's happening here. They have 12 days of (badly confounded data) on boosters, so they feel comfortable making claims about... 12 days.
It's a terrible headline as well, so not the OP's sole fault.
Harambe wrote:
OP is a moron and we've been here before.
Remember when everyone was like " the CDC says the shots don't work for more than a month!!1" when we only had 1 MONTH of data?
That's exactly what's happening here. They have 12 days of (badly confounded data) on boosters, so they feel comfortable making claims about... 12 days.
It's a terrible headline as well, so not the OP's sole fault.
YOU are the moron: he posted the exact and accurate title.
"Can enhance protection in adults over 60 for at least 12 days...a result that does not indicate a long term benefit.
1. Can, not does. That's troubling.
2. Enhance protection, not provide protection. More troubling.
The only clear conclusion is no long term benefit.
Harambe lying again
Just take a booster shot every other week. Problem solved.
Finito wrote:
Harambe wrote:
OP is a moron and we've been here before.
Remember when everyone was like " the CDC says the shots don't work for more than a month!!1" when we only had 1 MONTH of data?
That's exactly what's happening here. They have 12 days of (badly confounded data) on boosters, so they feel comfortable making claims about... 12 days.
It's a terrible headline as well, so not the OP's sole fault.
YOU are the moron: he posted the exact and accurate title.
And see how it was immediately interpreted by the denier-types? Maybe the OP didn't intend this but they should clarify, if not I will assume the intent was to mislead.
Context matters.
Harambe wrote:
Finito wrote:
YOU are the moron: he posted the exact and accurate title.
And see how it was immediately interpreted by the denier-types? Maybe the OP didn't intend this but they should clarify, if not I will assume the intent was to mislead.
Context matters.
Why do you put yourself through this?
It's just trolls or very depressed people who watch their world model crashing down around them and are just grasping at straws...
Posting those data as a "bombshell" is just laughable sad. The BroJos should gift them all free therapy.
Now for the important question. When does the NY Times Twitter account get shut down for "misinformation." I have been told that any facts or opinions that go against "Dah Science" are extremely dangerous and must be silenced. Our geriatric president and hyena cackling VP have decided we all need boosters so surely this cannot stand.
On a serious note if the NY Post had posted this they would have been locked out by Twitter for a week.
2600 bro wrote:
Harambe wrote:
YOU are the moron: he posted the exact and accurate title.
And see how it was immediately interpreted by the denier-types? Maybe the OP didn't intend this but they should clarify, if not I will assume the intent was to mislead.
Context matters.
Why do you put yourself through this?
It's just trolls or very depressed people who watch their world model crashing down around them and are just grasping at straws...
When you can't win the argument on the facts, psychoanalyze those whose views you do not share.
12 days ? Harambe & 2600: You guys getting fitted with catheters ? That would beat being stabbed by 30 needles a year.
CVS and Walgreens need to figure out a way to use robots to give 300 Million shots every 12 days.
Meanwhile, Pfizer and Moderna senior management will be enjoying crisp fall evenings sipping the finest wines as the season winds down at their villas in the Hamptons and on Martha's Vineyard.
Understatement of the century by Micha Mandel of Hebrew University.
************
However, the researchers acknowledged the data showed only a short-term benefit to booster doses. "We cannot tell at this point what will happen in the long run," Micha Mandel, a professor of statistics and data science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said.
https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2021/09/16/booster-shots
The first vaccine regimen takes the “novel” out of the novel coronavirus. Now, if you’ve been vaxxed, it’s just a cold. Catch it and let your body build some robust natural immunity.
Then get it again…and again…just like every other cold that doesn’t kill you.
Covid is a NBD cold if you’ve been vaxxed. No need foe boosters.
IM HEER TO BE UPSEST
The Unkle wrote:
1. Can, not does. That's troubling.
2. Enhance protection, not provide protection. More troubling.
1. It's really not lol. Literally no credible study makes a direct assertion like that based of preliminary findings.
2. First two doses provide protection, the booster enhances it... What is difficult about that to you? No one ever billed (any) vaccines as a 100% gaurantee...
Whoever said the article is a terrible take is correct though. It's presented completely backwards (which you would realize if you actually ready it). The study assessed people who had the booster for at least 12 days and found GOOD results.
"At least 12 days after the booster, rates of infection were elevenfold lower and of severe disease nearly twentyfold lower in those who received a booster compared with those who had received only two doses, the researchers found"
This article twists the facts to make it seem like they only saw good results for the first 12 days which is not the case. The people who only had it for <12 days weren't even in the 'has a booster' group of people. What a joke lol. I'm embarrassed for people who spread stuff like that around. If only you could realize how stupid you come across....
Boosters in Israel are working VERY WELL... on top of the vaccine already working EXTREMELY well:
https://twitter.com/feldman_gil/status/1437846462721839104?s=20
Harambe wrote:
OP is a moron and we've been here before.
Remember when everyone was like " the CDC says the shots don't work for more than a month!!1" when we only had 1 MONTH of data?
That's exactly what's happening here. They have 12 days of (badly confounded data) on boosters, so they feel comfortable making claims about... 12 days.
It's a terrible headline as well, so not the OP's sole fault.
Harambe. Wins. Again.
baa baa wool wrote:
Harambe wrote:
OP is a moron and we've been here before.
Remember when everyone was like " the CDC says the shots don't work for more than a month!!1" when we only had 1 MONTH of data?
That's exactly what's happening here. They have 12 days of (badly confounded data) on boosters, so they feel comfortable making claims about... 12 days.
It's a terrible headline as well, so not the OP's sole fault.
Harambe. Wins. Again.
The average person I've talked to in real life easily grasps these concepts and understands why these headlines are so misleading.
Denier-fearmongers on LRC repeatedly make the same mistakes in analysis for months on end. The only reasonable conclusion is that these people are far, far below average intelligence. Likely 2+ standard deviations.
This is like Kasparov winning against a local scholastic player. Does it really mean anything?
The Unkle wrote:
Oh good.
Now we need a booster every 12 days.
These injections are too lucrative for pharma. It's a great business model, really. If not diabolical. Essentially turn the immune system into a subscription service.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/23/delta-variant-pfizer-covid-vaccine-39percent-effective-in-israel-prevents-severe-illness.htmlfiggo wrote:
These injections are too lucrative for pharma. It's a great business model, really. If not diabolical. Essentially turn the immune system into a subscription service.
Stop posting about things you don't understand.