Jimmkner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
The thread dunce speaks.
Yes indeed…Better you had stayed silent.
You can't help yourself - still proving me correct. Add complete jerk to your description.
Jimmkner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
The thread dunce speaks.
Yes indeed…Better you had stayed silent.
You can't help yourself - still proving me correct. Add complete jerk to your description.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Jimmkner wrote:
Yes indeed…Better you had stayed silent.
You can't help yourself - still proving me correct. Add complete jerk to your description.
I am indeed a jerk but you are the dunce. I can get you your cap on Amazon.
Next years she’s gonna run 13:40 hopefully then we get the needed 3rd category.
Ridiculous…
I get it not her fault born this way but extremely unfair for the women w/o her condition.
abcrunning wrote:
Next years she’s gonna run 13:40 hopefully then we get the needed 3rd category.
Ridiculous…
I get it not her fault born this way but extremely unfair for the women w/o her condition.
I think it makes the sport way more interesting. It is not clear she will beat the doper Hassan. This makes the sport more exciting actually.
You know what's more ridiculous than intersex people running in women's races?
Creating a new division for people who make up .02% of the population.
Geldings are no rarity in the horse racing community. Over a quarter of all thoroughbred starters in North America are geldings, and they take home roughly a proportionate amount of overall prize money, according to Jockey Club officials.
Francine Niyonsaba is now the Milton Berle of women's distance running...she pulls out just enough to win.
Today was even more farcical than Paris. Niyonsaba was clearly jogging with the pack for lap after lap. I don't think she has any idea how bad it looks when you're apparently well beaten at 150 meters and then surge past three top talents to a comfortable win. Coe has emphasized the eyeball test with regard to Mboma. This is far worse.
The announcers are hamstrung. Swangard and Goucher are still in raving stage. It can't last long. Only the offseason will interfere. As I posted the other day, Niyonsaba is already #2 in women's distance and the key variable is what happens when Hassan unleashes a sprint finish, with Niyonsaba in the same race. There is no reason to believe Niyonsaba won't parry her rather easily.
Difficult dilemma for world athletics. The outcries that XY athletes will overtake the sport are pure ignorance. At any given time there will never be more than a handful of elite high testosterone runners, if that many. You might as well permanently adorn a dunce cap if you think a separate category is warranted. But the few will dominate any running event they are allowed to enter. Mboma's start and turn at 200 were already noticeably better today. She ran 21.84 despite logically being well below Tokyo level in terms of intensity and freshness. The XY athletes aren't immune from letdown. That 21.84 already looked several tenths better than Tokyo, once the energy level and finish are fully restored.
Awsi Dooger wrote:
The outcries that XY athletes will overtake the sport are pure ignorance... But the few [intersex] will dominate any running event they are allowed to enter.
😭bruh are you reading what youre typing 🤣🤣
rojo wrote:
While I personally think functioning testes should be a disqualifier for all of women's sport and, you've got to admit her reinvention in a new event is a pretty neat personal story. She's a very good competitor.
Her incredible form the last few weeks makes me wonder if she was DQd for a sinister reason in Tokyo.
https://www.letsrun.com/news/2021/08/the-disgraceful-disqualification-of-francine-niyonsaba/https://twitter.com/letsrundotcom/status/1433859082100908037
It’s a dude … that is a male … how hard is this to understand..?
just ban them then. simple.
potato_salad wrote:
You know what's more ridiculous than intersex people running in women's races?
Creating a new division for people who make up .02% of the population.
there are categories in the PARALYMPICS for much smaller percentages of the population. Intersex should be a category in the paralympics.
Jimmkner wrote:
thoughtsfailure wrote:
We would just like for our daughters to have a fair chance in athletics. I don't want my daughter losing her spot in her top 7 in cross country to a kid that was on the football team 12 months ago.
Are you really concerned about this? Seriously? You strike me as an overbearing Little League type parent.
He doesn't have a daughter.
Jimmkner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
You can't help yourself - still proving me correct. Add complete jerk to your description.
I am indeed a jerk but you are the dunce. I can get you your cap on Amazon.
You are halfway to understanding the truth about yourself.
this all lacks such respect . she has a name is it that hard to use it?
who are you to judge wrote:
this all lacks such respect . she has a name is it that hard to use it?
Shouldn't it be Frank?
if she likes to be called frank then sure use it ... but my guess is she doesn't .
has she got functioning testes? has she even got testes? we dont know what she has,or doesnt have.
Boys shouldn’t run against girls
jeff tallon wrote:
has she got functioning testes? has she even got testes? we dont know what she has,or doesnt have.
To exceed the IAAF testosterone limits she would need to have functioning testes.
who are you to judge wrote:
if she likes to be called frank then sure use it ... but my guess is she doesn't .
You're also guessing "she" is female. 46XYDSD is male.