what meanest thou? wrote:
mehhh wrote:
This is the definition of a transphobic comment. You need to stop. It's not funny, you aren't being cheeky, you aren't adding any value at all. You are adding grossness and hate to the conversation
So... disagreeing with someone is t
'transphobic'? If you disagree with my belief in God, because to a degree faith is metaphysical, something I feel inside, does that make you theophobic, or religiophobic, or whatever you want to call it?
I don't think so. Its not hateful, nor is it 'phobic'. Its just a disagreement, and you're welcome to that opinion. Stop throwing insults and labels at those who don't follow the latest leftist social narrative!
There isn't any sort of "disagreement" in this post. Because you seem confused down to the base of what language actually is, I'll help you out. The post has transphobic elements in that Sam starts out by dehumanizing Hiltz by nit only ignoring their preferred pronouns but Sam takes it one step further by using the pronouns "is" and "this" as though Hiltz isn't a human. Sam also demands to know what is happening at the base, physical level of their body, which isn't something that is being discussed FOR LITERALLY any other people in the 1500.
These are both known forms of violence perpetuated commonly in the trams and non binary communities.
It's not about disagreement ots about use of language that is dehumanizing.
But cute try with all your words.