No
No
Yes, its part of the United States ugly racist history that has effects and consequences to this very day.
asking stuff wrote:
No
You mean do we support teaching history, all of it, no matter how uncomfortable it is?
Yes.
asking stuff wrote:
No
Maybe we should get on the same page first.
Can you explain what CRT is and which parts you object to?
Yes
No. We have separation of church and state in this nation. The religion of CRT has no place in schools.
I do support the teaching of factual history, absent CRT histrionics.
I was watching this black intellectual man on YouTube in an attempt to actually see how any of this is my fault, and he said things like “you live in a suburb designed to keep white people in and black people out based on the cost of living” reality: I live in the poorest county in my state, mostly white. “You buying that high rise condo in the middle of the city has now driven up property values and put a black grandma out of a home” I have never purchased property in the city. Maybe it’s time to stop painting with such a broad brush. Maybe it’s time to direct your anger at the wealthy elites, stop paying attention to the fact that they are white. I, a white male who grew up in a small town, have more in common with George Floyd than I do with Bill Gates, but you choose to see only the surface level, the skin. Why? Because that is what you are told to see.
First off, I am a teacher. I have never once been asked to teach CRT. I network with 1000s of teachers across several states, and I have never heard of one teacher being told they need to teach it.
However, I think the country would be a better place I’d we did.
Please outline “critical race theory curriculum” that is being taught so I can make a judgment call on if I support it or not.
Why would anyone support revisionist history and indoctrination into an ugly raical ideology
I support conservatives pearl clutching about the moral panic of the month before moving onto the next one. I enjoy watching boomers construct straw men, tear them down, and act like the intelligent populace cares at all.
looomin wrote:
asking stuff wrote:
No
Maybe we should get on the same page first.
Can you explain what CRT is and which parts you object to?
I don't know exactly what it is.
CRT is the new Sharia law is going to take over scare.
OozmaKappa wrote:
Why would anyone support revisionist history and indoctrination into an ugly racial ideology
Isn't that the Trump/Republican Party attachment to historic white supremacy?
"B-but orange man white supremacy 🤓"
L comeback. Weak non sequitur.
I dont support white supremacy and your comment doesnt really make any sense. White supremacy continues to be a boogeyman used by the left to create racial tension.
looomin wrote:
asking stuff wrote:
No
Maybe we should get on the same page first.
Can you explain what CRT is and which parts you object to?
How about keep Racial Identitarianism out of everything, cool?
We don't need racism being taught in schools, simple.
Ray Cyst wrote:
You mean do we support teaching history, all of it, no matter how uncomfortable it is?
Yes.
This. Absolutely.
fully vaxxed, anti-masked wrote:
No. We have separation of church and state in this nation. The religion of CRT has no place in schools.
I do support the teaching of factual history, absent CRT histrionics.
This is utterly meaningless nonsense and the sort of thing that gets printed on novelty t-shirts and sold at the town fairground
'I support the teaching of the facts I like and not the ones that make me uncomfortable'.
I taught race relations back in the early 1970s after the Watts riots.
Can someone cite the actual CRT textbook or teaching guidelines so I can see them? My first search found a decidedly legal pdf that was far above the level of a college student. It cited five elements of CRT that were accurate as far as they went, but they presented an incomplete and thus inaccurate picture of a very complex topic.
If this is going to be taught in schools, there should be a standard curriculum. Where is it? Thanks.