It really isn't that surprising that Concordia finished in the top half of the MIAC. If you look at the results from the MIAC championship race this year, you can see that Concordia had runners place 1st, 17th, 18th, 28th, and 36th. According to the NCAA Cross Country/Track and Field 2021 and 2022 Rules Book, Rule 21, Section 6, Article 3b, this means that Concordia scored a total of 100pts because you have to add up those 5 finishing places.
I did the math, and there were only 4 teams that had lower point totals prior to counting their 6th runners. These teams were Carleton (50pts), St. Olaf (59pts), St. John's (86pts), and Gustavus Adolphus (98pts). Since there are 11 teams in the MIAC and Concordia finished 5th according to these calculations, it seems obvious they should have finished in the top half of the MIAC.
One interesting thing to note, however, is that there were technically only 10 teams in the MIAC competition this year. That is because St. Mary's only had 3 runners compete, and according to Rule 21, Section 6, Article 3c of the same NCAA Rules Book, that means they are not a complete team and do not count in the final results. In the case of St. Mary's, they were probably unable to have a full team this year because they do not have wifi. This greatly hinders their ability to send recruitment emails and visit LetsRun.com where they can gain essential running insight.
This is just my opinion that it seems obvious Concordia should have finished in the top half of the MIAC, but maybe I am missing something. My guess is that the above post is from one of the "liberal arts" Northfield schools, where they do not gain practical skills such as adding up numbers and comparing statistical results.
Here is my source of the rules: