More Good News, Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine reportedly 100% Effective in Adolescents!

You and CNN don’t know how to interpret results

That's actually bad news for students, who will now be encouraged to continue distance "learning" until every last one of them gets the vaccine.

good or bad news wrote:

That's actually bad news for students, who will now be encouraged to continue distance "learning" until every last one of them gets the vaccine.

That’s actually good news because maybe LetsRun morons will actually get vaccinated

Great news. More and more morons are outing themselves. Yes, and let's just believe the company that lied to Americans over and over and paid billions in criminal charges over decades. Fool me once shame on me, fool me 132 times....well..

And you believe this?

Covid doesn't even harm adolescents

fakey fakey wrote:

Great news. More and more morons are outing themselves. Yes, and let's just believe the company that lied to Americans over and over and paid billions in criminal charges over decades. Fool me once shame on me, fool me 132 times....well..

You mean opioids are not safe and non addictive?

Big Pharma lied to us?

Never.

They only have our best interests at heart. Money never figures in to what they do

This is akin to a headline:

Mafia says it does not exist

good or bad news wrote:

That's actually bad news for students, who will now be encouraged to continue distance "learning" until every last one of them gets the vaccine.

This is only 12 year olds though. WONT ANYONE THINK OF THE TWO YEAR OLDS??

yes yes yes yes wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/31/health/pfizer-vaccine-adolescent-trial-results/index.html

Already authorized for people 16 and older in the U.S.

Will be seeking emergency use approval from FDA shortly.

Look for it to be available by the end of this year.

There is no reason to vaccinate the children for a virus that barely gives them the sniffles.

Lead Foil Hat II wrote:

There is no reason to vaccinate the children for a virus that barely gives them the sniffles.

The vaccines prevent transmission so it's a great way to get us to herd immunity faster.

We will be done with COVID regardless, though.

Astra Zeneca recalled in Canada due to harsh side effects.

STEVE THE ADDICT^^^^^^ wrote:

Astra Zeneca recalled in Canada due to harsh side effects.

And the J&J vaccine screwed this guy pretty good - a rash so bad his skin started peeling! 😲

I can't help but laugh when the 74 yr said he's "still grateful to have received the vaccine." I hope he has a full recovery because his entire body looks like a mess from the adverse reaction.

yes yes yes yes wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/31/health/pfizer-vaccine-adolescent-trial-results/index.html

Already authorized for people 16 and older in the U.S.

Will be seeking emergency use approval from FDA shortly.

Look for it to be available by the end of this year.

It's 100% effective? One hundred percent effective at what exactly - blocking potential transmission of all variants of Covid-19? 100 percent - nobody slips through the cracks, it's as simple as getting the jab. And this revelation comes from the company that makes it. Really.

Look the point here isn't even about the merits of vaccines or not and if you should or shouldn't get a vaccine for covid-19. The point here is that even if this is 95% effective (which would be great, if it's not 100% as the company is claiming they are therefore lying to you/us).

So let's see - maybe it is then hooray for Pfizer - someone is getting rich. If it is not, then where exactly do we think this leaves us as a society on this entire, tiresome subject?

Harambe wrote:

Lead Foil Hat II wrote:

There is no reason to vaccinate the children for a virus that barely gives them the sniffles.

The vaccines prevent transmission so it's a great way to get us to herd immunity faster.

We will be done with COVID regardless, though.

Yes, by people not getting sick. You still believe asymptomatic spread is significant. Children don't get sick, they will reach herd immunity just as fast by picking up the virus and building a natural immunity. Also, if everyone who is susceptible is vaccinated, then who cares if it spreads around? What is the point then; to mitigate positive covid tests in people showing no symptoms. Children should not be getting mRNA vaccines nor vaccines with emulsion based adjuvants. Also, they get enough vaccines for serious diseases that threaten children, we don't need to overburden kids' immune systems just to make people with covid OCD feel less anxious, nor help people like yourself who are trying to bank off of the vaccine companies making money. If parents want to vaccinate their kids for a virus that does not effect kids as some sort of virtue signaling effort, fine, but this should not be forced on the children....it is ridiculous. Harambe, you are mostly a ridiculous liar anyways, so why I am even responding. Selfish idiot, yes your virtue signaling is selfish and self-centered.

You realize children can spread the disease to someone vulnerable if they get COVID?

Not everyone who is vulnerable is vaccinated yet.

Also vaccine immunity seems to be BETTER than natural immunity! Why not get the vaccine?

Overburden children's immune systems? I thought you were worried we were weakening immune systems b/c of social distancing? Would getting COVID itself overburden the immune system too?

This is all kind of moot because vaccines are crushing COVID as is... especially with the Biden Boost of 3M per day. I always chuckle at your contrarianism though. Anything that is popular consensus you are against.

Just because you repeat the same things every single day, it doesn't mean it is popular consensus.

Again, let's look at the data. This is a study of only 1,100 test subjects. It appears to be a short-term study of two months but it's hard to tell for sure because I could only find press releases and articles on this study. I could not find the actual clinical trial itself. (If anyone can find the actual trial report and not just a summary, let me know. I would like to read it.)

It was a trial of 1,100 test subjects getting the vaccine. I suspect that they were extremely well screened to remove those people at greater risk of a severe reaction. The general 12-15 cohort that includes kids that are obese and with medical conditions might have worse reactions.

In the general population, the number of unexplained deaths after the vaccine is roughly 1 out of every 50,000 vaccinations. That's far too small to show up in a test of only 1,100 subjects, especially considering that they were certainly screened carefully.

Still, 1 in 50,000 sounds low, but 1/50,000 would be 300 deaths in the 12-15 year cohort. For perspective, there have been only 246 deaths from COVID in the entire 0-17 year cohort. That's the entire 0-17 age group. I can't find data specifically for 12-15, but it would probably be in the range of 60-100 deaths.

The bottom line is the number of unexplained deaths per capita after the vaccination in the adult population is higher than the risk of death from COVID itself in children under the age of 18,

If I were a parent I would absolutely hold my child back from vaccination until it had been given to maybe 4-5 million kids to see if they all survived the vaccination. We'd expect kids to have stronger immune systems and hopefully we will see no deaths due to the vaccination,

The long-term risk is still unknown, but I don't think parents will have the option of turning down the vaccination. The only thing they can do is wait as long as possible to see the reactions of other kids. Hopefully, kids will be fine.

So, I see fisky - was the study designed not to fail? Only 1100 test subjects over a 2 month period? And they removed any kids with medical issues or obesity? Lol (not the real world where so many kids these days have medical issues and more & more are clinically obese).

Why didn't pharma go with 100,000 kids over a several month period?

And the worst part of this all is that it seems they're hiding the fully-detailed clinical trial and just want the mind-controlled population to read the summary. Lol.

Well...let's see if that pro-vaxx shill harambe character can provide the actual clinical trial. If anyone has access to it, it would be him. If he doesn't provide it, that means there's something fishy going on.

Murph800 wrote:

Just because you repeat the same things every single day, it doesn't mean it is popular consensus.

No, it's just correct. I don't care about consensus among LRC troglodytes.

Here, some of the only decent date on prior infection protection:

Natural protection is not as good as the vaccine -- current evidence shows.