Should there be a minimum i.q. in order to have children?

Look, a Nazi!

dumbos having kids wrote:

I'm seeing more and more dumbos having kids that shouldn't. People that never made it past 7th grade, low functioning criminal people who are going to disregard their kids basic needs.

Should there be an i.q. requirement?

Yeah but people like me could then say that you should not have kids. Where does this end?

dumbos having kids wrote:

I'm seeing more and more dumbos having kids that shouldn't. People that never made it past 7th grade, low functioning criminal people who are going to disregard their kids basic needs.

Should there be an i.q. requirement?

Absolutely. But, instead, we do the opposite. We actually reward low IQ people for having multiple kids. Then we tell them they are victims & martyrs & we owe them for the consequences of their own poor choices. Then we censor/dox/cancel non-woke people who don’t toe the line, speaking of Nazis per previous poster

Idiots are useful, especially impressionable, inexperienced coll wrote:

Then we censor/dox/cancel non-woke people who don’t toe the line, speaking of Nazis per previous poster

Yes, forced sterilization has NOTHING to do with Nazis and anyone who suggests it does is just a woke lib trying to CANCEL legitimate debate.

World needs ditch diggers too.

When I was in HS, the kid who was the class president was the son of Ivy league educated parents who were both high up in big regional banks. They let the kid drive their Porsche to prom. He stole a bunch of liquor from home and got wasted with his friends after prom. He went around a curve in a residential neighborhood doing about 65 and flipped the Porsche and wrapped it around a tree. His girlfriend was in the passenger seat and had to have half her liver removed due to massive internal injuries from the accident.

I am more concerned about what the kids of wealthy, highly educated parents than I am about kids of people who have minimal education.

That a silly thing to be worried about. Violent crime is correlated to low IQ and poverty, not high IQ and wealth. Being worried about the exceptions, not the rule, is just low level thinking.

DirtyT wrote:

That a silly thing to be worried about. Violent crime is correlated to low IQ and poverty, not high IQ and wealth. Being worried about the exceptions, not the rule, is just low level thinking.

Exactly. But, Precious Roy is always going to take the extreme outlier of an example to make his Orweillian points and foster his liberal narrative.

DirtyT wrote:

That a silly thing to be worried about. Violent crime is correlated to low IQ and poverty, not high IQ and wealth. Being worried about the exceptions, not the rule, is just low level thinking.

OK so you should not have kids if you have a low IQ and you are poor. Eugenics should be implemented and codified in the laws of the land. We need to create a super race. Not sure you’d be in it.

Jimmbo wrote:

DirtyT wrote:

That a silly thing to be worried about. Violent crime is correlated to low IQ and poverty, not high IQ and wealth. Being worried about the exceptions, not the rule, is just low level thinking.

OK so you should not have kids if you have a low IQ and you are poor. Eugenics should be implemented and codified in the laws of the land. We need to create a super race. Not sure you’d be in it.

He's not talking about Eugenics, just making a point about how dumb Precious Roy's post and some of the others are on here are. Nobody is talking about forced sterilization.

An N of 1 wrote:

Jimmbo wrote:

OK so you should not have kids if you have a low IQ and you are poor. Eugenics should be implemented and codified in the laws of the land. We need to create a super race. Not sure you’d be in it.

He's not talking about Eugenics, just making a point about how dumb Precious Roy's post and some of the others are on here are. Nobody is talking about forced sterilization.

Of they are implicitly discussing forced sterilization. This is a slippery slope. Surely you understand this? Otherwise what is the point other than to vent about others having kids?

Jimmbo wrote:

DirtyT wrote:

That a silly thing to be worried about. Violent crime is correlated to low IQ and poverty, not high IQ and wealth. Being worried about the exceptions, not the rule, is just low level thinking.

OK so you should not have kids if you have a low IQ and you are poor. Eugenics should be implemented and codified in the laws of the land. We need to create a super race. Not sure you’d be in it.

Also, nothing is going to be "codified" about preventing mating. However, I would advance that a low IQ should be a barrier to voting. The inner city ignorant youth as well as the redneck rural idiots.

The whole point of this thread is eugenics. IF one cannot grasp this, one is not very bright.

An N of 1 wrote:

Jimmbo wrote:

OK so you should not have kids if you have a low IQ and you are poor. Eugenics should be implemented and codified in the laws of the land. We need to create a super race. Not sure you’d be in it.

Also, nothing is going to be "codified" about preventing mating. However, I would advance that a low IQ should be a barrier to voting. The inner city ignorant youth as well as the redneck rural idiots.

One should be a white make property owner to vote. Surely this is the bare minimum? Make America Great Again!

Jimmbo wrote:

An N of 1 wrote:

Also, nothing is going to be "codified" about preventing mating. However, I would advance that a low IQ should be a barrier to voting. The inner city ignorant youth as well as the redneck rural idiots.

One should be a white make property owner to vote. Surely this is the bare minimum? Make America Great Again!

Speaking of not very bright, not what I'm saying at all. READ. You *brilliant* urban intellectuals absolutely get to vote. In fact, because you are so bright, you should get two votes!

OK so you want low IQ people to not vote? Is this clear? Trump would have never been president if that had been the case. Surely you are bright enough to grasp this?

Jimmbo wrote:

OK so you want low IQ people to not vote? Is this clear? Trump would have never been president if that had been the case. Surely you are bright enough to grasp this?

Yep, I surely am. He's a dumba$$. Why are you making this thread about Trump and the Red-Hatters? You keep pivoting to this, when this thread has nothing to do with him.

My comment is "tongue-in-cheek" to make a point and to counter the stupid narrative coming out of the mouths of the Precious Roys of the world. Many of us are not members of either of the parties which have been hijacked by their most extreme elements.

just remember Casey Anthony is still allowed to bear and raise children.

An N of 1 wrote:

Jimmbo wrote:

OK so you want low IQ people to not vote? Is this clear? Trump would have never been president if that had been the case. Surely you are bright enough to grasp this?

Yep, I surely am. He's a dumba$$. Why are you making this thread about Trump and the Red-Hatters? You keep pivoting to this, when this thread has nothing to do with him.

My comment is "tongue-in-cheek" to make a point and to counter the stupid narrative coming out of the mouths of the Precious Roys of the world. Many of us are not members of either of the parties which have been hijacked by their most extreme elements.

You are the one who changed the topic. This thread is about eugenics. You are either for it or against it. You apparently want either forced sterilization or mandatory abortion after an IQ test. That is the topic of this thread.