victims should have no voice, right? wrote:
deydoodoodohdohdontdeydoo? wrote:
Probably a disgusting freak (surprise, surprise) but it's a rum world in which a man can have his life ruined by one Tweet or Instagram post, by a woman who stands to financially gain from it.
Or are you more worried a bunch of incels are going to call it "cancel culture".
You sounded like you were making an intelligent point until that bit, but then I stopped reading.
What exactly do you 'progressives' mean when you accuse any man criticising radical feminism or defending due process against men, of automatically being 'incels'?
Are you admitting that your male feminism is simply a successful sexual strategy (by implying that anyone who isn't a male feminist is pursuing an unsuccessful mating strategy)?
Even if you're saying that anyone who disagrees with a feminist, only does so because they are bitter at being an incel, that would still imply that the only reason you agree with feminists is because you are getting laid.
In either case, it's a rum world, and a pretty neanderthal one at that, in which ethics and justice is determined not on facts and reason, but whether or not you're getting laid. It does explain, however, why so many male feminists turn out to be devious sexual predators.