Armstronglivs wrote:
What a relief that an ancient astronomer has assured you the earth isn't flat. You would never have known otherwise.
But in respect of "the earth isn't flat" observations I made about breathing being related to a higher RBC and improved aerobic capacity the only alternative position, if you dispute that relationship, is to accept the propositions in the questions I posed above. Logically you are required to maintain the converse of what I argued. So - go ahead and prove it.
I will remind you what my questions were.
- How does a higher RBC not mean that more oxygen can be carried for each breath?
- How does an improved aerobic capacity require a runner to breath harder for the same effort than when they had lesser aerobic capacity?
What is more important than my being assured the earth is flat, is that you don't need to rely on my representations, which may be distorted by my own personal bias, as I have given you an original source, and the means to evaluate, and to verify, or falsify, the claim, for yourself. You do not need to agree or disagree with me to determine for yourself if the Islamic astronomer was correct.
It is shallow thinking, to attempt to reduce this ventilatory exchange into the false dichotomy that by not accepting your statements at face value, I am denying them, and/or maintaining "the converse of what (you) argued. To be clear, you have not argued anything, but have simply given your own personal interpretation of something, or some things you may have, or may not have, read, and/or heard. With respect to breathing rate as a function of red blood cells, I have not yet established a position, in order to maintain one. I could consider your argument only after you provide something, of substance, to consider.