Nadal shows doping at the top of tennis

You come into the barn when you start spewing your "knowledge".

Armstronglivs wrote:

Analysis from the ignorant is meaningless.

I hope you don't mind, but I borrowed your own phrase with a minor tweak, as it seemed as good as any to sum up your contribution.

There must be a word for seeing your faults in others, but not in yourself.

Armstronglivs wrote:

No post you make is anything other than a personal attack - because you have nothing else to say and no knowledge of anything. But you are obsessed with me, as you follow me from thread to thread. I suppose stalking is a perverse kind of flattery, but debate with you brings to mind the expression 'wrestling with a pig' - one only gets covered with mud. I'll leave you in your trough.

Nope. You're projecting.

You simply cannot handle people disagreeing with you and it's YOU who has trouble not regressing to personal insults and your standard variations of 'ur dumb"

You should be flattered that you're getting any human interaction at all.

rekrunner wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Analysis from the ignorant is meaningless.

I hope you don't mind, but I borrowed your own phrase with a minor tweak, as it seemed as good as any to sum up your contribution.

There must be a word for seeing your faults in others, but not in yourself.

Like a glove.

I still think there's another word for really old people shouting schoolboy retorts endlessly though. That just seems remarkably odd. Imagine if that happened face to face with some retiree. Bizarre and sad.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Ultra or Die wrote:

@Rojo: this poster continues to verbally assault me. Please ban him

Speaking of class.... calling people morons, etc. , is not very classy.

Nadal is clean and pure as the driven snow. (or at least you have failed to prove otherwise)

You poor little snowflake. You melt so easily. And are about as substantial.

quite sure you wouldn't say that if I was standing in front of you.

@Rojo: ban please

rekrunner wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Analysis from the ignorant is meaningless.

I hope you don't mind, but I borrowed your own phrase with a minor tweak, as it seemed as good as any to sum up your contribution.

There must be a word for seeing your faults in others, but not in yourself.

The master of projection himself.

Ultra or Die wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

You poor little snowflake. You melt so easily. And are about as substantial.

quite sure you wouldn't say that if I was standing in front of you.

@Rojo: ban please

I'm terrified. I think I should call for your ban for threatening physical violence. You fierce little snowflake.

ej7 wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

You're "the world"? That's an interesting definition for an asylum.

Hence our dialogue, Kiwi MacTurdson.

Still engaging with the voices in your head, I see.

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

No post you make is anything other than a personal attack - because you have nothing else to say and no knowledge of anything. But you are obsessed with me, as you follow me from thread to thread. I suppose stalking is a perverse kind of flattery, but debate with you brings to mind the expression 'wrestling with a pig' - one only gets covered with mud. I'll leave you in your trough.

Nope. You're projecting.

You simply cannot handle people disagreeing with you and it's YOU who has trouble not regressing to personal insults and your standard variations of 'ur dumb"

You should be flattered that you're getting any human interaction at all.

It depends what you call human interaction. You dont really qualify.

And here goes another full day of you lashing out childishly.

But you claim to not like pigs.

Says it all really.

Allen53 wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

So the main Covid denier on these boards has made his way across to join with the doping deniers. Of course he has.

Yes of course- I stated that likely all players are doping and in your fevered imagination that equates with denying that there is doping.

You really are an unhinged whack job.

Just once pull your knuckles off the floor and try to manage a coherent thought.

Speaking of "unhinged whack jobs", surely the champion of Covid-deniers can come up with an explanation for why everyone is doping in tennis except Nadal. Perhaps not. A bridge too far.

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_calling

Says it all really.

Wikipedia says everything for you.

That's why it's so accurate.

Bravo chap for holding ,

your own against many here.

So obvious what Nadal and others up to

But not as obvious as cheptegei .

The base dope for all these athletes is the speed peptide ,igf_1 lr3.

Will allow older athlete compete well into late 30,s , saving nervous system.

See what it did for Kim Collins ,

now that was just as legit.

Defying years of what saw in sprinting until then.

Or defying the ideal body type for sprinting going from muscular 5'10" to taller skinny ideal within decade , again just suspend logic

. Something is amiss and leaves dope.

Whatever endurance ped cheptegei on it is amazing and can nearly see the few lucky athletes dissed out to this year.

So far got rid of Paula,s and bekele from record books , truely amazing stuff.

Sport in general has become so dirty

and the general apathy in society allows this to go largely unquestioned.

imagine epo era happening in current society , probably go unchecked for double ,triple the duration before even might try to call out or even enforce.

Investigative journos what were they again

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

That's why it's so accurate.

Quite.

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

And here goes another full day of you lashing out childishly.

But you claim to not like pigs.

Well, there you go again - identifying with another humble creature. A moment of rare insight.

These threads are part of the resistance to seeing what is in front us.

Armstronglivs wrote:

The master of projection himself.

Are we in third grade? Seriously? "I know you are but what am I?"

It's comical to watch the same pattern play out in every thread you participate in, as it predictably degrades into a cycle of exchanging 3rd grade level personal insults and responses rather than substantive content.

Speaking for myself, you keep emphasizing doping is widespread, even at the top, including Nadal, as if the question of prevalence at the top of tennis were ever under dispute.

Let's assume Nadal is doping because everyone is doping, for the sake of putting that red-herring to the side. The topic of your thread is not that he dopes, but that "Nadal shows ..."

The doubts I have about the content of your posts, is that 1) you suggest something "magical" happened, and 2) only doping has these "magical" properties.

I don't find it all that surprising that the world #2 ranked 34 year old specialist on clay, beat the #1 ranked 33 year old, in a tournament on clay.

PS: If anyone is keeping score, I disagree with Allen53 and Sprintgeezer about other topics in other threads, but in this one about tennis, they schooled you.