rojo wrote:
" just finished reading a Q&A that Chris Kelsall did with Stewart McSweyn of Australia. I had forgotten (or maybe didn't know) that McSweyn made his first Worlds team in 2017 in the steeple. That got me to looking at his PR progression on tilastapaja.
In 2016, McSweyn didnt even have a 1500 or mile pb listed on tilastapaja. His pbs in 2016 were 7:54, 13:41 and 28:29 (plus 8:34 in the steeple). Now he's a 3:30 NR, 27:23 NR guy who is hoping to break 13:00 soon that doesn't even steeple.
In 2015 or 2016, what was the view on the guy? If I told you' he'd go on to have the 1500 NR, would you have thought I was crazy? What was he viewed as? I mean did people even recognize him as having the talent for the NR in the 3 and 10 let alone the 1500 which he didn't even run at the time."
-------------------
objective observer wrote:
I don´t think it is very strange that Stewy has made some big jumbs after he reached his twenties. He apparently was kind af a multi sportsman well up in his teens before starting training seriously as a runner so it seems natural that his progression has been delayed.
Stewy, however, ran 14:58 in the 5000m at 16 which is not too bad for a youngster who has not yet focused solely on running. His first top time came at age 22 where he ran 13:05.
Further he ran 8:59 at he 3000m at age 15 and his first top time 7:54 at 22.
You can say it is not very impressive BUT........
It is not far from Galen Rupp´s times in his teens and early twenties:
Galen ran 14:34 at 16 in the 5000m and 13:07 at 24.
In the 3000m Galen ran 8:03 at 18 but have never ran faster outdoor than 7:43.
So if Stewy was an "also-ran" before his early twenties so was Galen at least in the 5000m.
BUT I DON´T THINK YOU WOULD PUT GALEN IN THAT CATEGORY? I think Galen has be quite hyped since his high school time.
-----------------------
There are many other examples of top runners who first went from "sub elite" to the top in their twenties some times even in their mid or late twenties.