55yyhh wrote:
There's only one JS wrote:
Interesting stuff. What kind of guarantees?A sub 2:20 within nine months or money back?
Why didn't you ask JS for these guarantees or money back? With your problematic easily damaged foot no coach can give you guarantee of a special fast result.
Canefis, how do you feel when your former coach behaves like a mentally challenged person and tries to have a dialogue with you pretending to be someone else?
It's not surprise me... Matter his system that has good potential, but like any system requires refinement and adjustment. I have already suggested that I would change in the system.
My opinion, which is based on the results of Phil, Sammy, a Kenyan woman runner, is still not suitable for a marathon, because there is no necessary volume, there is no aerobic resistance workouts, there is no specific endurance workouts to a sufficient extent. Yes, maybe up to the level of 02:30:0/-02:40:00 in the marathon, the system will still work, but then we need more sophisticated workouts. Also, if you have a weak aerobic base (a beginner European type runner), then the disadvantages of the system are especially noticeable. My aerobic base is not completely weak, even if I am a novice runner, but I have 3 years of road cycling under my belt, you can already see for yourself by seeing how much LT and 5K work I did and how quickly I could gain a weekly mileage of 100++.
1) leave the 3 fundamental stones of the system unchanged, but dance from them to the specific distance and weaknesses of the runner (individually).
2) Periodization: base-construction-peak-race-recovery-base-construction-peak-race-recovery...
3) Strength component and injury prevention