yall make me sad wrote:
chllin369^2 wrote:
Lol so this is a guy that goes out in 49-mid for a fast 800. Two ways he can run this:
1. Go out in 48-flat and use as little energy as possible. Then blast home a 24.7 200.
2. Get out fast AF, like 47-low and then hold it together for about a 25.5 last 200.
For Rudisha I would say #2 is his best bet. For Brazier, a 47-low would probably cook him since his 400 speed is not at Rudisha's level. His 1500 is far superior. Def go for the smooth-AF 48 flat.
This shows me how uneducated 99% of letsrun users are. Yikes. Yes, on paper these are the ways to do it. No, it is not as easy as you say. Plus coronavirus has made things waaaaaaay harder
Dude, 100%. I didn't really follow this and then saw the MB headline that "600m world best under threat" and knew exactly what the content would be. Endless hypothesizing of "all he needs to do" (classic to begin with) followed by "a 47.x followed by a 24.x, or a 48 flat then another 24-five" - it all falls under the same comical level of expectation that had people creaming their jocks over Brazier "maybe getting the AR" at a high school track in front of 40 people.
The 600m worlds best is very, very legit. It's not a soft worlds best at all. Rudisha, a 45.0 400m runner who obviously did quite well over 800m, tried (albeit only once or twice seriously) and did not get it. A comparative 800m time is under 1.42 so yes, this may almost have been Grays best career mark. The only two people in the last decade who have had any shot at this are Rudisha and Amos (in peak form btw) and that's because they are the only two guys who have run sub 1.42.
Brazier had a basically non-existent chance of doing this, not because "he wanted to race" or "the weather" or "covid" - but because he's not physically capable of this yet (and probably never will be). This doesn't mean he isn't the worlds best 800m runner because he is, but this wasn't going to happen and now hopefully everyone can cool off the unreal expectations on this dude.