You are the only one lying. EPO test existed in 2000.
You are moving your goal post and changing you arguments on the spot, if I sum up all your claims:
1) Komen was heavily doped with EPO, he feared for his life and stopped taking it, and therefore become a very poor runner. He was very low level without EPO and world class with it.
2) El Guerrouj doped with EPO and then fled when the tests became effective in 2005 right after accomplishing his lifetime goal of olympic medals. Without EPO El Guerrouj is a hobby jogger of 36 min 10k according to you.
3) Bekele was/is doping with EPO even after the tests existed, and even after the test "became effective" according to you, he still won olympics and championship medals , setting world leading times until injuries crippled him and he moved to road racing where he had several great marathon performances, including the 2nd best performance ever 2 seconds away from the world record, at 37 years old.
So what's your argument, Bekele avoided the the effective tests, or is he the only person where the EPO has a modest increase of performance when you are claiming at the same time that both Komen and El Guerrouj were nothing without EPO?
Make up your mind, or at least find a decent explanation for all your claims. So far it's baseless and lame rant about africans being so much better than british runners and Ingebrigtsen.
I find it amusing that you are not speaking about Mo Farah, the most obvious cheat of the sport. The journeyman turning into the invincible runner at 28 years old, when prime athletic on the trac is way sooner than that..... His coach has been banned from the sport for doping violations.