The official (and only) Ahmaud Arbery thread

You’ve got to admit it sorta kills the narrative that he was just jogging by.

That’s really my only beef with this case, as much as everyone else is trying to make me out to be some racist imbecile.

coyote22 wrote:

I’ve also fought for justice for many that were killed or harmed by violence. Most of it gang related. Everyone is someone’s son, brother, father, friend no matter what they’re involved in.

I’m sorry you don’t like my take on the facts but I have nothing against the victim. I mean, I’m a prosecutor, I fight for the victim constantly. I just don’t think the story is what the media has presented.

The McMichaels were unaware of Arbery being in the vacant house so there was zero justification for what they did. While they were chasing him, they told the 911 dispatcher a black guy was running down the street. They ran him down, were ready to kill and they did.

Please share with us, the real story.

Have you realized your error in claiming that the McMichaels knew of Arbery being at the unfinished house?

coyote22 wrote:

Yeah, I never said points 1 and 2 apply to the legality of their actions, just my interpretation of what the videos show. And I did say in point 3 that I’m not sure of the legality of a citizens arrest here. That’s for a jury to decide and many smaller decisions and points of law go into that.

Let’s be clear. I am not defending what they did. I am giving an objective observation. The only thing I feel personally passionate about is that he is not a jogger-martyr. That is not the same thing as agreeing with their actions.

If there is one thing leftists (and virtue signalers) hate, it’s objectivity.

I live in a rapidly gentrifying residential neighborhood in a big city. People steal materials and tools all the time from contractors and construction sites in my neighborhood. It is not like a bank heist. You just drive up, take stuff and drive off. You don't have to case the construction site before hand.

coyote22 wrote:

You’ve got to admit it sorta kills the narrative that he was just jogging by.

That’s really my only beef with this case, as much as everyone else is trying to make me out to be some racist imbecile.

It does change anything at all about how our excuse the two gunmen that shot him. The two gunmen as shown in the police reports did not see him at the house not did they witness anything remotely being theft. The gunmen only saw him jogging outside and brought heavy duty guns with them and chased in a vehicle. Your false accusations of him being a thief are just that, false.

Unlike your attempt at painting an extremely false narrative if the victim, the backgrounds of the two gunmen need to be checked thoroughly for any ties to hate groups. It is not in any way normal to chase down a runner with heavy duty guns in a pickup truck. That only signifies your intent to kill.

If you read my original post I said I don’t know. Obviously they knew something because they knew to chase him. I do not know the source of their knowledge. There is video where someone claims their truck is visible in the frame (the video where you can see the red porta potty and the front of the house under construction) but I don’t know if that’s true. I’ve also said I read a neighbor told them. The fact remains I don’t know how they found out or the extent of their knowledge.

I have not excused what they did.

I simply don’t agree with the jogger narrative. I don’t know how many times I have to repeat that for you all to get it through your thick skulls. Do you guys really run 4 minute miles carrying around that heavy pile of rocks in your head?

coyote22 wrote:

If you read my original post I said I don’t know. Obviously they knew something because they knew to chase him. I do not know the source of their knowledge. There is video where someone claims their truck is visible in the frame (the video where you can see the red porta potty and the front of the house under construction) but I don’t know if that’s true. I’ve also said I read a neighbor told them. The fact remains I don’t know how they found out or the extent of their knowledge.

B.S. and yet you are so sure that you accused the victim of being a thief. By your shoddy "I don't know anything" sources of evidence, it could just be as likely the two white gunmen are part of the KKK as others have pointed out.

coyote22 wrote:

If you read my original post I said I don’t know. Obviously they knew something because they knew to chase him. I do not know the source of their knowledge. There is video where someone claims their truck is visible in the frame (the video where you can see the red porta potty and the front of the house under construction) but I don’t know if that’s true. I’ve also said I read a neighbor told them. The fact remains I don’t know how they found out or the extent of their knowledge.

Uh no. You said that you didn't know HOW they knew, not that you didn't know IF they knew. And you've repeated that here again. These are important differences that a prosecutor would understand.

coyote22 wrote:

I have not excused what they did.

I simply don’t agree with the jogger narrative. I don’t know how many times I have to repeat that for you all to get it through your thick skulls. Do you guys really run 4 minute miles carrying around that heavy pile of rocks in your head?

Your insistence on attacking the victim can only be interpreted as an attempt to devalue the life that was lost.

coyote22 wrote:

I have not excused what they did.

I simply don’t agree with the jogger narrative. I don’t know how many times I have to repeat that for you all to get it through your thick skulls. Do you guys really run 4 minute miles carrying around that heavy pile of rocks in your head?

Not that it matters, but nothing you have posted refutes the "jogger" narrative. You are literally stating your opinion as fact.

Cool story brah.

coyote22 wrote:

Monkeys typing wrote:

Do you have a credible link for this?

https://youtu.be/Q7N6bC5cnVU

That is the video of prior to the shooting, where is your substantiation for "being there at other times".

Why are you lying?

Is this how you supposedly operate in court?

The thing is, and I am for the death penalty, none of this warrants a death sentence. Or really any reason to follow orders to anyone not a uniformed police officer.

coyote22 wrote:

I have not excused what they did.

I simply don’t agree with the jogger narrative. I don’t know how many times I have to repeat that for you all to get it through your thick skulls. Do you guys really run 4 minute miles carrying around that heavy pile of rocks in your head?

He isn't a jogger, because " he walked into the house"...good grief, and you claim to be a prosecutor? BS

If he ran into the house you would say "any jogger would slow down to a walk before entering"

The McMichaels may get off if a prosecutor like you actually exists.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

coyote22 wrote:

I have not excused what they did.

I simply don’t agree with the jogger narrative. I don’t know how many times I have to repeat that for you all to get it through your thick skulls. Do you guys really run 4 minute miles carrying around that heavy pile of rocks in your head?

Your insistence on attacking the victim can only be interpreted as an attempt to devalue the life that was lost.

Oh my goodness will some of you guys just stop?! Here we go again. It's the "you're either with us or against us mentality". It gets so old and you guys just continue to ignore objective, factual information. I'm a woman and I'm telling you guys to stop being so emotional. Use some common sense. It's like all you guys want to do is sit around and speculate all day long, rather discuss the facts that have been presented. You don't like what coyote is saying so you keep having a go at her. Try discussing with her, not attacking her. Good grief. Are you guys not capable of having a rational discussion with people you do not agree with? It's an important life skill. It's how I stay married. And for what's worth (which is probably not much) I mean all of this in the kindest way possible.

coyote22 wrote:

I have not excused what they did.

I simply don’t agree with the jogger narrative. I don’t know how many times I have to repeat that for you all to get it through your thick skulls. Do you guys really run 4 minute miles carrying around that heavy pile of rocks in your head?

The whole run for Run for Ahmaud thing is just people stroking their own egos trying to feel about themselves. Don't let their virtue signaling bother you on the case.

You say you don't like how the "media" is portraying the shooting. Would long articles in the WaPo and NYT about Arbery bringing a gun to a HS game or whether he committed a crime by entering the vacant house, be of value? Why?

Whether it was because the McMichaels hate black people, joggers or fake joggers, they hunted him down like an animal and killed him. That is the story.

I am Sam wrote:

coyote22 wrote:

I have not excused what they did.

I simply don’t agree with the jogger narrative. I don’t know how many times I have to repeat that for you all to get it through your thick skulls. Do you guys really run 4 minute miles carrying around that heavy pile of rocks in your head?

He isn't a jogger, because " he walked into the house"...good grief, and you claim to be a prosecutor? BS

If he ran into the house you would say "any jogger would slow down to a walk before entering"

The McMichaels may get off if a prosecutor like you actually exists.

Stop with the jogger nonsense. He didn't just "walk into the house". He had been caught on video at the house at night at least 3 times previously before this incident. He was walking down the road well before he turned towards the house.