Have you counted the number of those so called "Not White" in the best of all times lists starting 800m to marathon?
So truth comes out. How are you anti whitey? I think you should take another look at that 800-10000 list again. 800 is littered with white folk, 1500-10000 just added a whole slew just in the last couple of years. We know where Wightman, Kerr, and Fisher lie. And you know Kessler, Myers, and Laros are upcoming superstars. Also, doesnt matter where anyone is as long as Jakob has all the records. You lose. Awww
I'm skeptical Jakob is doping, but I'd have to agree the shoes, the tracks, and the pacing lights help relative to anything even 10-20 years ago. Still, anytime someone breaks a Komen record it has to be hats off. Great job.
track and field and many other sports are corrupt,mostly because its a business,and people want to celebrate world records.Positive doping results are bad for business,so athletes at the top are always protected.hes doped out of his skull.
With Crouser, Kipyegon and now this absurd performance from ingebrigtsen antidoping is nothing more than window dressing. So for you who think he's clean, what would he have run if he was doped - 7.45? A guy who is slower than athletes like Elliott and Snell over 800m runs 2 miles scarcely slower than the same speed as they ran a world record for one. On the same basic training. Oh - it's the shoes. Sure.
What a master of reasoning. What a confindence in your own intellectual superiority. You should write an essay about epistemology. It will be a breakthrough in scientific understanding. And probably in logic too. You should also write a piece on antidoping in Norway and how they fail over and over again, including some evidencebased assesments on the sport culture in Norway.
Jakob Ingebrigtsen was asked about shoes and wave light before the race. "It was much more easy in the 90ties".
With Crouser, Kipyegon and now this absurd performance from ingebrigtsen antidoping is nothing more than window dressing. So for you who think he's clean, what would he have run if he was doped - 7.45? A guy who is slower than athletes like Elliott and Snell over 800m runs 2 miles scarcely slower than the same speed as they ran a world record for one. On the same basic training. Oh - it's the shoes. Sure.
What a master of reasoning. What a confindence in your own intellectual superiority. You should write an essay about epistemology. It will be a breakthrough in scientific understanding. And probably in logic too. You should also write a piece on antidoping in Norway and how they fail over and over again, including some evidencebased assesments on the sport culture in Norway.
Jakob Ingebrigtsen was asked about shoes and wave light before the race. "It was much more easy in the 90ties".
I see you don't agree. But you don't have any reasons. So how does a guy slower over the 800m than some of the greatest md runners of the past on the same basic training run two miles at the speed they ran one? It's a rhetorical question. The answer is glaringly obvious. And it isn't talent or shoes.