Official LRC President Joseph R Biden Thread

Sally Vix wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

But wait you already have it because sally said you are me right? 😂 Their LDS is incurable.👋🏻

Are we really pretending to be retarded (can I say that?) and do not know Gina and Trillminator are not the Ginamator?

I like it when he forgets to logout of one account and ends up replying to the same account with a “I totally agree with your post.” It just shows the desperation. Keep it up. I LOVE it. 😂😂😂😂😂🥂🥂🥂🥂

Hambr0 wrote:

Welcome to Dementia joe’s America. Get used to it. It’s like we’re living in a 3rd world country. 👎👎👎🤡🤡🤡

https://www.foxbusiness.com/lifestyle/virginia-gas-station-prices-7-per-gallon

If the consumer had to pay for the damage it does, $7 a gallon sounds about right.

Of course, if that happened, we might see a quick end to gasoline. Then we would have clean air like during the shutdown. And little kids wouldn't need to go to the ER from asthma attacks. And everyone would live longer. And we haven't even started on the averted climate disasters....

Trollminator wrote:

And it didn’t even take 60 failed lawsuits and millions of wasted dollars on several recounts to spot several trumpers committing election fraud. And they still haven’t found those fraudulent Biden votes. Amazing isn’t it? Every time they accuse Ds of something it’s a dead giveaway that they are doing it themselves.

Bolded text is spot on. It is a tried and true tactic of Trump that the Trumpettes have picked up as well. Before, during and after breaking the law, accuse your opponent of doing exactly what you are doing. It was a remarkably effective campaign tactic in 2016.

Sorry, but I was (and remain) absolutely correct. The statement stands as absolutely correct:

"There was never a time when the Constitution or any Amendment prohibited the POTUS and the VPOTUS from being from the same state. That is a common misunderstanding."

The item that you point to is exactly why many people have had this misconception. There is only the condition that no member of the EC can cast a vote for POTUS and VPOTUS who are both from the same state as the elector.

Democrat Pedophile and source for most of Ginamator's nonsense back in the news. Rick Wilson, yes THAT Rick wilson, is spewing some nonsense that I refuse to read. Ginamator can call him for a follow-up.

https://www.rawstory.com/impeach-biden/

Real Obvi wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Yep. 12th amendment makes it OK.

Correction: There was never a time when the Constitution or any Amendment prohibited the POTUS and the VPOTUS from being from the same state. That is a common misunderstanding.

Much thanks to both for corrections. I had it wrong.

In an effort to help make up for my error, a look at Biden's approval rating.

...Which is *down*--below 53%, meaning that The Gap is only +12.1%.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-approval-rating/

Purely for context, remember that after his 13th day in office, The Gap for Trump was negative *every* single day through the rest of his term, a record for consecutive disapproval not approached by any other president. (And he still nearly won.)

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/

Ivyguy wrote:

In an effort to help make up for my error, a look at Biden's approval rating.

...Which is *down*--below 53%, meaning that The Gap is only +12.1%.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-approval-rating/

Purely for context, remember that after his 13th day in office, The Gap for Trump was negative *every* single day through the rest of his term, a record for consecutive disapproval not approached by any other president. (And he still nearly won.)

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/

Biden's approval rating is the highest for a president since 2009. Well it was last week anyway.

No.

Real Obvi wrote:

upyourwazzu wrote:

Article II of the Constitution (not changed by the 12th Amendment): "The electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for two persons, of whom one at least shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves."

Sorry, but I was (and remain) absolutely correct. The statement stands as absolutely correct:

"There was never a time when the Constitution or any Amendment prohibited the POTUS and the VPOTUS from being from the same state. That is a common misunderstanding."

You missed the Constitution part I quoted.

The "common misunderstanding" is with your source.

But, sure go ahead and try having a winning P-VP from the same state where that state's Electors get to chose which of the two gets their votes. The other one has to hope they win the beauty contest in front of Congress (which gets to decide the VP in such a situation).

camus wrote:

Good luck Joe. We will never be a “ perfect Union” but can always strive for “ a more perfect Union.”

We are once again the leaders

If this is leadership, we are in deep trouble. LOL . What do you think of him now?

Ivyguy wrote:

In an effort to help make up for my error, a look at Biden's approval rating.

...Which is *down*--below 53%, meaning that The Gap is only +12.1%.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-approval-rating/

Purely for context, remember that after his 13th day in office, The Gap for Trump was negative *every* single day through the rest of his term, a record for consecutive disapproval not approached by any other president. (And he still nearly won.)

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/

Which is to say if Biden is breathing in 2024 he wins.

upyourwazzu wrote:

Real Obvi wrote:

Sorry, but I was (and remain) absolutely correct. The statement stands as absolutely correct:

"There was never a time when the Constitution or any Amendment prohibited the POTUS and the VPOTUS from being from the same state. That is a common misunderstanding."

You missed the Constitution part I quoted.

The "common misunderstanding" is with your source.

But, sure go ahead and try having a winning P-VP from the same state where that state's Electors get to chose which of the two gets their votes. The other one has to hope they win the beauty contest in front of Congress (which gets to decide the VP in such a situation).

INCORRECT!

I missed nothing. My statement stands as absolutely CORRECT:

"There was never a time when the Constitution or any Amendment prohibited the POTUS and the VPOTUS from being from the same state. That is a common misunderstanding."

Perhaps you are having trouble differentiating between the Constitution (with Amendments) prohibiting the POTUS and VPOTUS from being from the same state and the prohibition of an elector from the EC casting both a POTUS and a VPOTUS vote for persons of the same state as the elector. These are quite different statements.

upyourwazzu wrote:

Real Obvi wrote:

Sorry, but I was (and remain) absolutely correct. The statement stands as absolutely correct:

"There was never a time when the Constitution or any Amendment prohibited the POTUS and the VPOTUS from being from the same state. That is a common misunderstanding."

You missed the Constitution part I quoted.

The "common misunderstanding" is with your source.

But, sure go ahead and try having a winning P-VP from the same state where that state's Electors get to chose which of the two gets their votes. The other one has to hope they win the beauty contest in front of Congress (which gets to decide the VP in such a situation).

Dude - it is only the electors from a single state (the state where the P and VP nominee reside) that had any sort of prohibition on casting their votes. ALL OTHER ELECTORS have never had any prohibition. As such, there was certainly NEVER a prohibition of the POTUS and the VPOTUS being from the same state.

Stop embarrassing yourself.

Real Obvi wrote:

upyourwazzu wrote:

You missed the Constitution part I quoted.

The "common misunderstanding" is with your source.

But, sure go ahead and try having a winning P-VP from the same state where that state's Electors get to chose which of the two gets their votes. The other one has to hope they win the beauty contest in front of Congress (which gets to decide the VP in such a situation).

INCORRECT!

Try taking your head out our ass. You are wrong. That drives your tiny brain insane. You are wrong. You are wrong. You are wrong. You are wrong. You are wrong. You are wrong.

PS. Look up the lawsuits about this and see if your pea brain can grasp that a court decided (a Reagan judge) that Cheney could claim he was a Montana resident even though he was still living in Texas where his primary home was, after the election. It was only after the election that he went on a fire sale to get rid of that house. The case had absolutely nothing to do with the Constitution. It had everything to do with what state he could claim as a resident, and a republican friendly judge.

Handbro wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Are we really pretending to be retarded (can I say that?) and do not know Gina and Trillminator are not the Ginamator?

I like it when he forgets to logout of one account and ends up replying to the same account with a “I totally agree with your post.” It just shows the desperation. Keep it up. I LOVE it. 😂😂😂😂😂🥂🥂🥂🥂

Should be easy for you, show one example of that.

I have told silly Sally troll many times I am not Trollminator.

ENJOY YOUR LOSS 👋🏼

Gina.. wrote:

Handbro wrote:

I like it when he forgets to logout of one account and ends up replying to the same account with a “I totally agree with your post.” It just shows the desperation. Keep it up. I LOVE it. 😂😂😂😂😂🥂🥂🥂🥂

Should be easy for you, show one example of that.

I have told silly Sally troll many times I am not Trollminator.

ENJOY YOUR LOSS 👋🏼

Actually I think Trolliminator and Calamity Joe are the same.

upyourwazzu wrote:

Real Obvi wrote:

INCORRECT!

Try taking your head out our ass. You are wrong. That drives your tiny brain insane. You are wrong. You are wrong. You are wrong. You are wrong. You are wrong. You are wrong.

PS. Look up the lawsuits about this and see if your pea brain can grasp that a court decided (a Reagan judge) that Cheney could claim he was a Montana resident even though he was still living in Texas where his primary home was, after the election. It was only after the election that he went on a fire sale to get rid of that house. The case had absolutely nothing to do with the Constitution. It had everything to do with what state he could claim as a resident, and a republican friendly judge.

You are either mind-blowingly stupid or an excellent troll.

The electors of Texas cannot vote for both POTUS and VPOTUS from Texas. Every other elector can. Same with electors from each state and candidates from their own state. That is all.

OK, you've gone far enough with this. You can come out now. Just trolling? (please say, "yes"). Or just unbelievably stupid?

You can't possibly be too stupid to understand: "The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves". Can you? My DOG, it would be horrible to be that stupid!

Anyway, I guess I'll have to give you full credit for trolling. Well done!