Iron Bars wrote:
rojo wrote:
Those of you who think LRC has been too open-minded about this will love this article.
If anything, it highlights the absurd lengths to which you and Gault have gone to bat for BTC and SH. Let’s see…
1) The piece defending SH unequivocally prior to the release of the CAS report.
2) Smearing the CAS/WADA/AIU scientists.
3) Ducking all questions invoking Occam’s razor and deleting threads rightly questioning your motives.
4) Citing some internet blog as factual scientific evidence to “debunk” the CAS report. A disgraceful podcast rant to push this agenda…
5) Last but not the least attempting to muddy the waters by prominently highlighting intersex athletes on the front page to draw parallels/sympathy for a convicted doper.
You guys have lost even the veneer of credibility.
Thank god, a writer with common sense on the issue. I think LRC does try very hard to be as open minded as possible. Sometimes we read what we *want* to read, but with that being said, I was disappointed with Gault earlier this year, and with all the running journos and media figures who were willing to just go to bat for Shelby. It was so strange to me.
I'm glad he trashed Erin Strout and that drivel she wrote for Women's Running. She'll probably whine a bit about sexism but give me a break with that stupidity.