GBohannon wrote:
kngtg wrote:
This women’s coverage has been appalling for the last 20+ minutes. Had no idea what pace Sara Hall was on, or whether she was still on AR pace. Haven’t seen the race for 2nd, 3rd, 4th women in ages. Just like the trials, women’s coverage fails again. Men’s race is minutes off AR pace, and it’s more of a priority.
Wait... when they showed the 40k split, you couldn’t fill in the gaps? Cmon man. Agreed that the coverage for the women’s finish left something to be desired though. I would give the coverage a B+ overall. Would’ve been a strong A were it not for the womens finish.
Wait...you expect me to pay good money for coverage of a marathon, and still have to take out a f**king calculator to do the splits, paces, and estimated finish myself?
I give the coverage a big fat F.