Your knowledge is very very limited as to how matters proceeded after an adverse finding in the 90’s.
You cannot apply what happens now under the WADA code and ukad’s application of such.
Further, it has been explained that there were no lawyers with any experience of what is now called “ sports law”. Modahl started to take a defence onwards via what were libel lawyers.
So you just can’t take implication from Edwards not doing the “ obvious” to defend himself and this must be guilty.
Further, the Medical Examination defence was not used and argued until 98 mainly because it took a proper lawyer ages to find out what rules actuslly applied..There is no reason to assume that Edwards knew anything about this as decisions were not
You accuse me of deception. How interesting and eventful!
Not attempt is being made to mislead, only to try and make sense of a very confusing time.
It should be obvious that many posters on the Edwards side have a depth of knowledge and for them to say the 94 Med Code says xx should have some traction.
There are doubts about the 94 test but that does not mean that I view him as wholly innocent , you have been told that.
However this thread followed from Letsrun publishing a report of Edwards Facebook campaign and that campaign was about the 97 test.You have been told that.
I note that you refuse to deal with a drug ban not being caused by cheating.
I am following the rules , which means that the 97 test must be valid to lead to a life ban.
You don’t care , so bye bye ?